Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology 2013
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt9qdzfs.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handheld XRF elemental analysis of archaeological sediments:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most commonly, pXRF has been applied to obsidian for provenance research, where it has enjoyed particular success largely owing to the homogenous and usually smooth surface of the material (Frahm & Doonan, ; Shackley, ). It has also been used successfully in museum studies (Shugar & Mass, ), on archaeological sediments (Coronel et al, ; Davis et al, ; Frahm et al, ; Gauss et al, ; Hayes, ; Hunt & Speakman, ; Neff, Voorhies, & Paredas Umana, ; Johnson, ; Lubos, Dreibrodt & Bahr, ), and extensively for the study of archaeological metals and ceramics (Forster, Grave, Vickery, & Kealhofer, ; Frankel & Webb, ; Karydas, ; Orfanou & Rehren, ; Potts & West, ; Tykot et al, ). Limitations of the device in general, are reviewed by Lemière (), in archaeology by Shackley () and Tykot (), on archaeological obsidian by Frahm (), and on archaeological sediments and ceramics by Hunt and Speakman () and Johnson (), to name a few.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly, pXRF has been applied to obsidian for provenance research, where it has enjoyed particular success largely owing to the homogenous and usually smooth surface of the material (Frahm & Doonan, ; Shackley, ). It has also been used successfully in museum studies (Shugar & Mass, ), on archaeological sediments (Coronel et al, ; Davis et al, ; Frahm et al, ; Gauss et al, ; Hayes, ; Hunt & Speakman, ; Neff, Voorhies, & Paredas Umana, ; Johnson, ; Lubos, Dreibrodt & Bahr, ), and extensively for the study of archaeological metals and ceramics (Forster, Grave, Vickery, & Kealhofer, ; Frankel & Webb, ; Karydas, ; Orfanou & Rehren, ; Potts & West, ; Tykot et al, ). Limitations of the device in general, are reviewed by Lemière (), in archaeology by Shackley () and Tykot (), on archaeological obsidian by Frahm (), and on archaeological sediments and ceramics by Hunt and Speakman () and Johnson (), to name a few.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%