2021
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handheld Point-of-Care System for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Extracted RNA in under 20 min

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health emergency characterized by the high rate of transmission and ongoing increase of cases globally. Rapid point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics to detect the causative virus, SARS-CoV-2, are urgently needed to identify and isolate patients, contain its spread and guide clinical management. In this work, we report the development of a rapid PoC diagnostic test (<20 min) based on reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and semiconductor technology fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method depends on the detection of SARS-CoV 2 from an extracted RNA samples. The developed LAMP assay was tested on a real-time benchtop instrument (RT-qLAMP), showing a lower limit of detection of 10 RNA copies per reaction [207]. The results showed sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 100%, respectively, compared to RT-qPCR and average positive detection times of 15.45 ± 4.43 min ( Fig.…”
Section: Genetic-based Analysis: Pcr Rt-qpcr Lamp and Crisprmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method depends on the detection of SARS-CoV 2 from an extracted RNA samples. The developed LAMP assay was tested on a real-time benchtop instrument (RT-qLAMP), showing a lower limit of detection of 10 RNA copies per reaction [207]. The results showed sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 100%, respectively, compared to RT-qPCR and average positive detection times of 15.45 ± 4.43 min ( Fig.…”
Section: Genetic-based Analysis: Pcr Rt-qpcr Lamp and Crisprmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results showed sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 100%, respectively, compared to RT-qPCR and average positive detection times of 15.45 ± 4.43 min ( Fig. 5) [207]. Another POC diagnostic test based on microfluidic platforms was reported to detect viruses using the rolling circle amplification (RCA) method [208].…”
Section: Genetic-based Analysis: Pcr Rt-qpcr Lamp and Crisprmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common thread among the studies was developing a more practical design of SPR-based virus detection systems with a certain level of sensitivity. The research focus in recent years on virus detection technologies has often been on sensitivity and speed, and for on-site detection technologies, whether the system can be handheld or wireless and employs reusable methods [82][83][84][85][86]. As for the research on virus detection technology using SPR, the major points required in the future are not high sensitivity and rapidity, but thin film formation and suitable construction systems to enhance the practicality and applicability.…”
Section: Current Application Of Spr For Virus Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 4 Though laboratory-based reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests remain the gold standard for confirmation of SARS CoV-2 infestation, many molecular diagnostic methods including reverse transcriptase-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assays have been reported. 5 , 6 However, we strongly believe that field deployment of these RT-LAMP assays is challenged by the high incidence of false positives, just like in the case of other LAMP assays explored for viral detections. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%