2001
DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.25.6.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handheld Computer-assisted Self-interviews: User Comfort Level and Preferences

Abstract: Objectives:To examine the comfort level and survey preferences of participants who completed handheld computer-assisted self-interviews (H-CASI). Methods: Obstetrics patients (N=187) were surveyed about their comfort with the H-CASI and its readability, likeability, ease of use, and preferability over paper-and-pencil surveys. Results: Most participants were comfortable using the handheld computer and stated a preference of H-CASI over paperand-pencil surveys. Previous computer experience and lower education l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several factors may explain this finding. The predominantly older head and neck cancer population may not be as adept at or willing to use an automated IVR system [14]. In addition, most patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer develop severe mouth and/or throat ulcerations (mucositis) that can make it very painful to speak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors may explain this finding. The predominantly older head and neck cancer population may not be as adept at or willing to use an automated IVR system [14]. In addition, most patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer develop severe mouth and/or throat ulcerations (mucositis) that can make it very painful to speak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected from June 2011 to June 2013 on tablet computers using handheld computer-assisted self interviewing, which can increase reports of sensitive behaviors (Bernhardt et al, 2001; Morrison-Beedy, Carey, & Tu, 2006) and is easy to use by respondents with low literacy (Al-Tayyib, Rogers, Gribble, Villarroel, & Turner, 2002; Edwards et al, 2007). The peer outreach worker provided assistance as participants completed the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research suggests that technology such as wireless MDs offers many benefi ts for behavioral assessment (Bernhardt et al, 2001(Bernhardt et al, , 2005, the evolving technology of wireless MDs, including enhanced multimedia and improved wireless capabilities of more recent MDs, may expand the benefi ts of applying such technology for alcohol assessment. In particular, although preliminary evidence suggests that wireless MDs may be an effective tool for delivering individually tailored messages to reduce drinking among college students , future research is needed to examine both the assessment and intervention capabilities of more recent, more advanced wireless MDs over longer time periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, wireless mobile devices (MDs) such as handheld computers, cellular phones, and smart phones provide a number of advantages over traditional paper-and-pencil methods of measurement and thus may be useful in improving the assessment of alcohol use among college students (Bernhardt et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%