2021
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handgrip Strength Asymmetry and Weakness Are Associated With Future Morbidity Accumulation in Americans

Abstract: Identifying strength asymmetries in physically deconditioned populations may help in screening and treating persons at risk for morbidities linked to muscle dysfunction. Our investigation sought to examine the associations between handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry and weakness on accumulating morbidities in aging Americans. The analytic sample included 18,506 Americans aged $50 years from the 2006-2016 Health and Retirement Study. Handgrip strength was measured on each hand with a handgrip dynamometer, and per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The “10% rule” was first proposed in the 1950s, indicating that the difference in HGS between dominant and non‐dominant hands was approximately 10% 17 . Numerous studies associated with HGS asymmetry applied the definition of an HGS ratio >10% 7–10,18–21 . Accordingly, HGS asymmetry was considered as an HGS ratio <0.90 or >1.10, and HGS symmetry was classified as an HGS ratio between 0.90 and 1.10 in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The “10% rule” was first proposed in the 1950s, indicating that the difference in HGS between dominant and non‐dominant hands was approximately 10% 17 . Numerous studies associated with HGS asymmetry applied the definition of an HGS ratio >10% 7–10,18–21 . Accordingly, HGS asymmetry was considered as an HGS ratio <0.90 or >1.10, and HGS symmetry was classified as an HGS ratio between 0.90 and 1.10 in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…17 Numerous studies associated with HGS asymmetry applied the definition of an HGS ratio >10%. [7][8][9][10][18][19][20][21] Accordingly, HGS asymmetry was considered as an HGS ratio <0.90 or >1.10, and HGS symmetry was classified as an HGS ratio between 0.90 and 1.10 in the present study.…”
Section: Hgs Weakness and Asymmetry Measurementmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This finding is partly consistent with previously reported results. Specifically, previous studies have reported that low HGS is linked to an increased risk of all‐cause mortality, 18,19,28,29 and the coexistence of low HGS and HGS asymmetry in older adults often indicates the presence of severe muscular dysfunction, rather than low HGS or HGS asymmetry seen individually, increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults 7,11,30 . But another study reported that females rather than males with HGS asymmetry had shorter time‐to‐death intervals 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen, Ho, & Chau, 2022). The presence of both HGS weakness and HGS asymmetry in older adults usually signifies more advanced muscle dysfunction relative to either of these conditions in isolation, exacerbating the risk of adverse health outcomes during aging (L. Klawitter, Vincent, et al, 2022;Lin et al, 2022;McGrath, Cawthon, et al, 2020;McGrath, Tomkinson, et al, 2020;McGrath, Vincent, et al, 2021). Therefore, it is important to pay close attention to instances of comorbid HGS weakness and HGS asymmetry in older populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%