Performance validity tests (PVTs) have become an integral part of comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. Though these measures are purported to be resistant to failure in individuals with brain injury (Larrabee, 2012), research shows that factors other than intentional malingering such as pain, fatigue, and psychological distress may affect performances on these tests when scores are slightly below the reported cut-off (Bigler, 2014;Lezak, Howieson, Bigler, & Tranel, 2012). Given that many of the most commonly used free-standing PVTs are presented as memory tests and some literature has documented superior episodic memory performance in individuals with indeterminate handedness (i.e., at least partially "left-handed"), the current observational, descriptive study investigated the influence of handedness on performance validity test scores. Contrary to expectation, results show that self-identified left-handers in a nonforensic clinical sample of convenience fail the Recognition Memory Test (but not the Word Choice Test) more often than right-handers when using standard cut-off scores. These results raise important questions about whether handedness should play a role in the interpretation of PVTs.