2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handedness differences observed in episodic memory retrieval do not extend to the domain of prospective memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the handedness effects accounted for variance above and beyond variance accounted for by other established memory effects observed in the paper, such as the effects of a retroactive interference condition in study one and the effect of context in study two. As with the working memory paper published by Sahu and Christman (2014), inconsistent handedness was shown to be a robust correlate of memory in addition to other factors. If anything, it suggests that every memory study should at least include handedness as a factor, even if it is not the main focus of the study.…”
Section: Recent Findings Related To Handedness and Memorymentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the handedness effects accounted for variance above and beyond variance accounted for by other established memory effects observed in the paper, such as the effects of a retroactive interference condition in study one and the effect of context in study two. As with the working memory paper published by Sahu and Christman (2014), inconsistent handedness was shown to be a robust correlate of memory in addition to other factors. If anything, it suggests that every memory study should at least include handedness as a factor, even if it is not the main focus of the study.…”
Section: Recent Findings Related To Handedness and Memorymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…While we caution that a null result is not exactly a disconfirmation of a theory, a replicated null result may still be informative. Sahu and Christman (2014) published a set of studies comparing inconsistent and consistent handers on two measures of prospective memory. In the first study, 105 participants completed a self-report measure of prospective and retrospective memory.…”
Section: Recent Findings Related To Handedness and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the relationship between handedness and episodic memory performance has been documented, this finding does not generalize to all other memory processes. For instance, there are no handedness differences on tasks of prospective memory because it is thought to rely more prominently on executive functioning (Sahu & Christman, 2014). Handedness group differences have been shown to only affect memory processes that require hemispheric interaction (Lyle, McCabe, & Roediger, 2008), such as word memory tests.…”
Section: Memory and Handednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, those with ICH, compared to those with CH, more accurately recall which hand they use to perform actions (Edlin et al, 2013). Handedness, however, is not associated with all memory types, such as prospective memory (Sahu & Christman, 2014), working memory (Sahu et al, 2016), or face recognition (Lyle, McCabe, et al, 2008). Further, strong right-handedness is associated with decreased interhemispheric interaction and higher rates of false memories (Christman et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%