2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203142189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the literature is examined, many researchers have utilised only multiple-choice questions to measure science process skills (Aydoğdu, 2017;Aydoğdu et al, 2012;Bahşi & Açıkgül Fırat, 2020;Ergül et al, 2011;Fathonah et al, 2018;Gill, 2019;Özçelik, 2019;Özgelen, 2012;Şensoy & Yıldırım, 2017;Şıvgın, 2019;Smith, 1995;Uysal & Cebesoy, 2020). However, there are also studies that utilised open-ended questions and activities, considering that the data collected only with multiple-choice questions would not be sufficient due to the nature of science process skills (Azizah et al, 2018;Çepni, 2004;Indri et al, 2020;Rezba et al, 1995;Rillero, 1998;Şahin et al, 2018;Serevina et al, 2018;Strong, 2013;Wu, 1994). All these latter studies were conducted with a limited number of participants due to the fact that they were conducted face-to-face and manually with the participants (Leat & Nichols, 2000).…”
Section: Measuring Science Process Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the literature is examined, many researchers have utilised only multiple-choice questions to measure science process skills (Aydoğdu, 2017;Aydoğdu et al, 2012;Bahşi & Açıkgül Fırat, 2020;Ergül et al, 2011;Fathonah et al, 2018;Gill, 2019;Özçelik, 2019;Özgelen, 2012;Şensoy & Yıldırım, 2017;Şıvgın, 2019;Smith, 1995;Uysal & Cebesoy, 2020). However, there are also studies that utilised open-ended questions and activities, considering that the data collected only with multiple-choice questions would not be sufficient due to the nature of science process skills (Azizah et al, 2018;Çepni, 2004;Indri et al, 2020;Rezba et al, 1995;Rillero, 1998;Şahin et al, 2018;Serevina et al, 2018;Strong, 2013;Wu, 1994). All these latter studies were conducted with a limited number of participants due to the fact that they were conducted face-to-face and manually with the participants (Leat & Nichols, 2000).…”
Section: Measuring Science Process Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with the use of individual manuscripts as the main object of study, the research was continued with an inventory of the manuscripts, presentation of manuscript information or text descriptions, writing text instead, to text translation. The method used in this research is a descriptive-analytical method to describe the various types of findings contained in the text of the text as analytical data (Secolsky, 2012).…”
Section: Religiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the curriculum-development process is integrated into a nine-stage generic process of assessment and evaluation that educators can use to formulate and implement as well as assess and evaluate improvement plans (Secolsky and Denison 2011;Yarbrough, Shulha, Hopson, and Caruthers 2010). The ensuing discussion relates the first eight stages to the Code's contents.…”
Section: The Second Step: Assessing and Evaluating Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%