“…The partnership was also about making it possible for individuals to obtain a better understanding of their own realities . We therefore argue that a research partnership centred around democratizing research in data generation and dissemination (Ansley & Gaventa, 1997;Checkoway & Richards-Schuster, 2003;De Lange, 2012;Knowles & Cole, 2008) may culminate in mutuality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly the case in emerging-economy countries, such as South Africa e currently the most unequal society in the world (OXFAM, 2013;The World Bank, 2012) e where resources are limited and not easily accessible, risks are high and the desire for feasible and innovative solutions drives many a scientific inquiry. A call to democratize research is one methodology discourse which challenges one-sided structures of constructing and negotiating power in research partnerships (Ansley & Gaventa, 1997;Checkoway & RichardsSchuster, 2003;De Lange, 2012;Knowles & Cole, 2008) and strives to enable academic engagement as well as contribution to community life and taking up social responsibility. Democratizing research and research for social justice (Lazarus, Erasmus, Hendricks, Nduna, & Slamat, 2008;Rosner-Salazar, 2003;Stanton, 2008;Winter, Wiseman, & Muirhead, 2006) carries with it the ambit of mutuality: knowledge generation in the scientific domain and improved functioning in the work and/or personal lives of civil society partners.…”
Section: Research For Social Change Through Partnershipsmentioning
“…The partnership was also about making it possible for individuals to obtain a better understanding of their own realities . We therefore argue that a research partnership centred around democratizing research in data generation and dissemination (Ansley & Gaventa, 1997;Checkoway & Richards-Schuster, 2003;De Lange, 2012;Knowles & Cole, 2008) may culminate in mutuality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly the case in emerging-economy countries, such as South Africa e currently the most unequal society in the world (OXFAM, 2013;The World Bank, 2012) e where resources are limited and not easily accessible, risks are high and the desire for feasible and innovative solutions drives many a scientific inquiry. A call to democratize research is one methodology discourse which challenges one-sided structures of constructing and negotiating power in research partnerships (Ansley & Gaventa, 1997;Checkoway & RichardsSchuster, 2003;De Lange, 2012;Knowles & Cole, 2008) and strives to enable academic engagement as well as contribution to community life and taking up social responsibility. Democratizing research and research for social justice (Lazarus, Erasmus, Hendricks, Nduna, & Slamat, 2008;Rosner-Salazar, 2003;Stanton, 2008;Winter, Wiseman, & Muirhead, 2006) carries with it the ambit of mutuality: knowledge generation in the scientific domain and improved functioning in the work and/or personal lives of civil society partners.…”
Section: Research For Social Change Through Partnershipsmentioning
“…Autant la fiction come objet d'étude constitue un champ de recherche (Goodman, 1968 ;Schaeffer, 1999 ;Metz, 1971) autant l'usage de la fiction comme pratique langagière à l'université est encore largement réser-vé au domaine des sciences sociales qui plus est principalement dans le milieu universitaire anglo-saxon, comme l'indique le nombre de publications sur le sujet depuis une vingtaine d'années (Bagley et Cancienne 2002 ;Banks 2008 ;Banks and Banks 1998 ;Barone and Eisner 2012 ;Dunlop 2001 ;Iser 1997 ;Knowles and Cole 2008 ;Leavy 2009Leavy , 2012Norris 2009 ;Viswesaran 1994 ;Mc Niff 2003). L'usage de la fiction en sciences sociales s'inscrit notamment dans le sillon des revendications des formes d'écriture comme construction socio-historique (Richardson et St Pierre, 2005 ;Denzin et Lincoln 1994, 2000Ellis et Bochner, 1999, 2000, 2003.…”
“…Tanto a ficção como objeto de estudo e campo de pesquisa (Goodman, 1968;Schaeffer, 1999;Metz, 1971) quanto os usos da ficção como prática de linguagem na universidade são ainda reservados ao campo das ciência sociais, principalmente no meio universitário anglo-saxão, como indica a quantidade de publicações sobre o tema nos úl-timos 20 anos (Bagley et Cancienne 2002;Banks 2008;Banks and Banks 1998;Barone and Eisner 2012;Dunlop 2001;Iser 1997;Knowles and Cole 2008;Leavy 2009Leavy , 2012Norris 2009;Viswesaran 1994;Mc Niff 2003). O uso da ficção em ciências sociais se inscreve notadamente nas reivindicações das formas de escrita como construção sócio-histórica (Richardson et St Pierre, 2005;Denzin et Lincoln 1994Ellis et Bochner, 1999, 2003.…”
Instrumento de coleta de dados, o diário de campo é amplamente recomendado no campo das ciências sociais, mas também cada vez mais indicado na pesquisa-criação. Supõe-se que esse instrumento metodológico contribua para a realização de uma pesquisa que atenda a certos critérios de cientificidade (Savoie-Zajc, 2003, Mucchielli, 1996). No entanto, alguns pesquisadores apontam dificuldades para se ater à análise e interpretação dos dados (Baribeau, 2005). Sem questionar a utilidade do diário de campo em pesquisa-criação, propõe-se uma concepção ampliada de diário de campo, que se estenda para a ficção.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.