2014
DOI: 10.1242/dev.107680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand1 phosphoregulation within the distal arch neural crest is essential for craniofacial morphogenesis

Abstract: In this study we examine the consequences of altering Hand1 phosphoregulation in the developing neural crest cells (NCCs) of mice. Whereas Hand1 deletion in NCCs reveals a nonessential role for Hand1 in craniofacial development and embryonic survival, altering Hand1 phosphoregulation, and consequently Hand1 dimerization affinities, in NCCs results in severe mid-facial clefting and neonatal death. Hand1 phosphorylation mutants exhibit a noncell-autonomous increase in pharyngeal arch cell death accompanied by al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(78 reference statements)
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, the observed defects likely arise during later differentiation of the NCC derived mesenchyme. Similar midfacial defects have recently been described in embryos containing phosphorylation variants of the bHLH factor Hand1 (Firulli et al, 2014). While the basis for the defects in these embryos is not completely clear, Hand1 is a downstream mediator of EDNRA signaling, suggesting the cellular affect of the two may share a common mechanism.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Rather, the observed defects likely arise during later differentiation of the NCC derived mesenchyme. Similar midfacial defects have recently been described in embryos containing phosphorylation variants of the bHLH factor Hand1 (Firulli et al, 2014). While the basis for the defects in these embryos is not completely clear, Hand1 is a downstream mediator of EDNRA signaling, suggesting the cellular affect of the two may share a common mechanism.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, this module includes a secondary network involving cell-cell junctions (Jph2, Des, Popdc2, Mtus2) and outliers suggesting neural function (Syt6, Chrna6, Trpm1). Because five genes in this module are involved in proximal-distal patterning of the mandible (Hand1, Nkx3-2; Lettice et al, 1999; Firulli et al, 2014; reviewed in Clouthier et al, 2013) and/or are regulated by the distal mandible patterning genes Dlx5/6 (Dlx1as, Hand1, Cited1, Rgs5; Jeong et al, 2008), we interpret the core network as patterning the mandible proximal-distal axis. If co-expression indeed reflects shared function, then this module also predicts that mandible patterning involves a cell-cell junction sub-network, the orphan GPCR Gpr50, the signal transduction/hypospadias (urethral fusion) risk factor Dgkk (van der Zanden et al, 2011), and the endosome recycling factor Magel2 (Hao et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the disruption of BMP signaling and downstream BMP targets such as H1 and H2 feeds back upon Fgf8 hinge expression. Indeed, in H1 dimer mutants, Fgf8 levels are markedly increased (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H1 expression is confined to the distal cap ectomesenchyme (4,5). H1 dimer mutants display noncell-autonomous craniofacial phenotypes outside of the distal cap (6). The H1…”
Section: The H1mentioning
confidence: 99%