2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00925-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand motor learning in a musical context and prefrontal cortex hemodynamic response: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,8 In addition, more and more intervention studies are implementing fNIRS as a primary outcome, comparing cortical activation before and after training in repeated measures designs. [9][10][11][12][13] For example, studies have used fNIRS to investigate learning-induced neural changes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) as well as in other motor regions during balance 9,12,13 and manual tasks 10,11 in young adults. These studies, however, did not take test-retest reliability into account, crucial for interpreting the changes in the BOLD signal as being meaningful rather than signifying measurement error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,8 In addition, more and more intervention studies are implementing fNIRS as a primary outcome, comparing cortical activation before and after training in repeated measures designs. [9][10][11][12][13] For example, studies have used fNIRS to investigate learning-induced neural changes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) as well as in other motor regions during balance 9,12,13 and manual tasks 10,11 in young adults. These studies, however, did not take test-retest reliability into account, crucial for interpreting the changes in the BOLD signal as being meaningful rather than signifying measurement error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well, pre-processing and processing should account for differences in the noise due to time, ROI, and population. The information in this review contained in Table S1 [ 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 ,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased OFC activity has been associated with faster response times (Bode et al ., 2018) and hand motor learning (Alves Heinze et al ., 2019). The increased rM1-rOFC functional connectivity observed here may therefore reflect the OFC’s role as a top-down motor control region (Ono et al ., 2014) which is involved in the regulation of motor responses and error monitoring (Alves Heinze et al ., 2019). In line with this hypothesis, Jackson et al (2003) showed increased activation in the right OFC in participants who significantly improved their performance in a right-hand motor task, either having physically executed the task or having performed motor imagery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed increased functional connectivity between our rM1 seed and the rOFC after right 50% MVC handgrip contractions. Increased OFC activity has been associated with faster response times (Bode et al ., 2018) and hand motor learning (Alves Heinze et al ., 2019). The increased rM1-rOFC functional connectivity observed here may therefore reflect the OFC’s role as a top-down motor control region (Ono et al ., 2014) which is involved in the regulation of motor responses and error monitoring (Alves Heinze et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%