2013
DOI: 10.1071/hi12056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand hygiene compliance: the elephant in the room

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With our results, we hope to illustrate the multiple perspectives of healthcare providers that need to be considered when striving for a real-life, contextual understanding of the challenges of hand hygiene management and infection prevention in this field. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of applied hand hygiene and infection prevention in complex care systems by identifying the role of organisational factors in facilitating or hindering the implementation and management of effective infection prevention in nursing homes [46, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With our results, we hope to illustrate the multiple perspectives of healthcare providers that need to be considered when striving for a real-life, contextual understanding of the challenges of hand hygiene management and infection prevention in this field. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of applied hand hygiene and infection prevention in complex care systems by identifying the role of organisational factors in facilitating or hindering the implementation and management of effective infection prevention in nursing homes [46, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We eliminated research that provided findings reported solely in quantitative or statistical terms, even when the findings were originally derived from qualitative data collection. We eliminated 12 reports in this stage that included two (Stevens et al, 2013; Whitby et al, 2006) reviewed by Smiddy et al (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%