2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand hygiene: An educational intervention targeting grass root level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall adherence to HH compliance is very low, as focus till now has been education and assessment of knowledge part of Hand Hygiene which has definitely shown improvement over the past few years may be because of celebration of World HH day on 5thMay every year. [3][4][5] The average HH compliance rate amongst student and residents was 40.14 % and 17 % respectively in this study. The other workers have also reported much lower HH compliance rate amongst doctor in India 13.75% by Gupta et al, 9% by Saiet al, and Kumar 28%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Overall adherence to HH compliance is very low, as focus till now has been education and assessment of knowledge part of Hand Hygiene which has definitely shown improvement over the past few years may be because of celebration of World HH day on 5thMay every year. [3][4][5] The average HH compliance rate amongst student and residents was 40.14 % and 17 % respectively in this study. The other workers have also reported much lower HH compliance rate amongst doctor in India 13.75% by Gupta et al, 9% by Saiet al, and Kumar 28%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Three studies were undertaken in the Far East (Fisher et al 2010;Salmon et al 2013;Suen et al 2019), one in Germany (Scheithauer et al 2012), two in the United States (Lavigne and Curran 2015; Kornicki and Miller 2016) and one each in Australia (Kaur et al 2017), India (Chauhan et al 2019), Finland (Korhonen et al 2019) and Turkey (Kısacık et al 2021). Four studies were undertaken with medical students (Fisher et al 2010;Scheithauer et al 2012;Kaur et al 2017;Chauhan et al 2019), five with nursing students, (Salmon et al 2013;Kornicki andMiller 2016, Korhonen, Suen et al 2019;Kısacık et al 2021), and one with pharmacy students (Lavigne and Curran 2015). Some studies recruited students at the earliest possible stage in their course (Kornicki and Miller 2016), others recruited more senior students (Fisher et al 2010), and some research teams included students at different points in their studies (Scheithauer et al 2012).…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other initiatives outcome measures included knowledge, excellence of practice, attitudes towards hand hygiene and satisfaction with the learning experience. Five publications reported uncontrolled before-and-after study designs (Scheithauer et al 2012;Salmon et al 2013;Lavigne and Curran 2015;Kaur et al 2017;Chauhan et al 2019). One reported a nonrandomised trial (Korhonen et al 2019).…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hand hygiene is recognized as the most important and cost-effective measure of bundle approach for prevention of all DAIs. 3 Due to the defective hand hygiene practice, microorganisms are often carried by the healthcare worker’s hand from the patients or their surroundings and are transmitted to the adjacent patients and their environment during routine procedures. Adherence to the five moments of the hand hygiene has been evidenced with definite decrease in the infection rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%