Hand Gesture Recognition Based on Electromyographic and Kinematic Analyses

Li, Zhengzhen; Li, Ké; Zeng, Haibin; Wei, Na

doi:10.1109/cisp-bmei48845.2019.8966000

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the 21 papers reviewed in this review, 14 (66.67%) ( [10], [11], [12], [15], [18], [19], [20], [21], [23], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]) were studies related to dynamic gestures. Eight studies (33.3%) ( [13], [14], [16], [17]) were conducted to recognize static gestures based on precise position estimation technology for various still motions by attaching many markers to specific body parts ( [24], [25], [27], [28]). For performance evaluation, various performance indices such as accuracy, F1 score, and error rate were used, as the degree of improvement in accuracy compared to previous studies, comparison of accuracy using various algorithms, and normalization using independent data other than the data used to create the learning model.…”

Section: A Marker-based Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decade of Progress in Human Motion Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey From 2010 to 2020

Noh,

Yoon,

Lee

2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The central perspective of this review is to categorize research in Human Motion Recognition (HMR) over the past decade into two significant categories: vision sensor-based (VSM) and wearable sensor-based methods (WSM). Within each category, research is further assessed from the viewpoints of sensors, classification algorithms, datasets, gesture types, target body parts, and performance. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the overall research trends and technological advancements in HMR. Both VSM and WSM present their own sets of advantages and challenges. VSM faces challenges related to limited workspace, varying lighting conditions, occlusion, and complex image processing. Conversely, WSM, compared to VSM, deals with challenges associated with multiple sensor calibration, intrusiveness, and magnetic field mapping due to sensor placement. As such, the choice between these methods depends on the specific application, the required level of accuracy, and user preferences. Gaining insights into the nature of various HMR methods and staying informed about recent research trends is of utmost importance. By the end of this review, readers will gain a comprehensive and systematic understanding of the latest developments in HMR techniques, which will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners alike.

show abstract