2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1118024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hanbury Brown Twiss Effect for Ultracold Quantum Gases

Abstract: We have studied two-body correlations of atoms in an expanding cloud above and below the Bose-Einstein condensation threshold. The observed correlation function for a thermal cloud shows a bunching behavior, whereas the correlation is flat for a coherent sample. These quantum correlations are the atomic analog of the Hanbury Brown Twiss effect. We observed the effect in three dimensions and studied its dependence on cloud size.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
406
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
17
406
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the significant bunching signal observed in the temporal second-order correlation function of a guided thermal cloud of atoms. The measured bunching amplitude of g (2) (0) = 1.21 is the largest bunching signal ever observed with atoms, more than three times larger than the previous highest signal 7 . The large bunching amplitude is due to the low effective transverse temperature (~nK) and large correlation lengths occurring within the guide, which prevents the signal from washing out because of imperfect detector resolution.…”
Section: Hanbury Brown-twiss Guiding Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Figure 3 shows the significant bunching signal observed in the temporal second-order correlation function of a guided thermal cloud of atoms. The measured bunching amplitude of g (2) (0) = 1.21 is the largest bunching signal ever observed with atoms, more than three times larger than the previous highest signal 7 . The large bunching amplitude is due to the low effective transverse temperature (~nK) and large correlation lengths occurring within the guide, which prevents the signal from washing out because of imperfect detector resolution.…”
Section: Hanbury Brown-twiss Guiding Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…1). The photon counters after the beam-splitter are replaced by a time-resolved, multi-pixel atom-counting detector 20 , which enables the measurement of intensity correlations between the atom beams in well defined spatial and spectral regions. The temporal overlap between the atoms can be continuously tuned by changing the moment when the atomic beam-splitter is applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] for a review). Single atom detectors have been used recently to perform Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiments with cold atoms 6,7 . Finally, analysis of noise correlations in time of flight experiments of ultra cold atoms has been proposed 8 and tested 9,10 , promising a powerful new technique to access many-body correlations in such systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%