HAMR: An AADL Multi-platform Code Generation Toolset

Hatcliff, John; Belt, Jason; Robby, .; Carpenter, Todd

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89159-6_18

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent work, Hatcliff et al [50], introduce HAMR (High-Assurance Model-based Rapid engineering) for embedded cybersystems which is built using AADL. HAMR is a component of the larger set of tools known as BriefCASE, which Collins Aerospace [51] presented.…”

Section: E Application Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Year Verified property Approach Formal language Tool verification effort (LoC) iDola [38] 2014 Exception management Refinement iDola Tsmart-Edola ~20 k RPC stub [44] 2015 Automating capabilities Theorem Proving Isabelle/HOL AutoCorres N/A mCertiKOS [39] 2016 Exception management Refinement Coq CompCert 3 k Gao et al [33] 2021 MILS scheduling Theorem Proving Coq Clightgen ~0.5 k EMS [35] 2021 Exception management Theorem Proving Coq N/A 15 k I/O-SM [40] 2021 I/O separation Refinement Coq Dafny 28,518 HAMR [50] 2021 Application development Refinement HOL AADL 40 k…”

Section: Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Is Formal Verification of seL4 Adequate to Address the Key Security Challenges of Kernel Design?

Siapoush,

Alves-Foss

2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Formal method tools are used in the initial stages of the software development cycle and have advanced in to deal with the design difficulties related to ensuring strong cybersecurity an reliability in high-assurance systems. Operating system kernels are the security keystone of most computer systems. Their continuous advances require formal verification that guarantees the accuracy of their functionalities. As the world's first microkernel to be proven mathematically secure and functionally correct, seL4 has been adopted for use in a range of critical systems, including defense, aerospace, and financial services applications. In spite of the great effort of the seL4 team to present a comprehensive formal verification of the kernels, there are some security aspects of verification that suffer from a limited scope. From an outsider's perspective, this paper aims to evaluate if seL4 formal verification is adequate to address security requirements and surveys the recent state of the art for seL4 microkernels.INDEX TERMS Microkernel, seL4, formal methods, correctness verification.

show abstract

Section: E Application Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Formal Verification of seL4 Adequate to Address the Key Security Challenges of Kernel Design?

Siapoush,

Alves-Foss

2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this purpose, developing consistent embedded systems using AADL (the architecture analysis and design language) is currently an interesting solution. But, one of the challenges inherent with modeling and analysis is maintaining consistency between the model‐as‐analyzed and the system‐as‐implemented 1 . Beside AADL language, several useful languages are used in systems engineering, in particular for real‐time system design, such as SysML and MARTE.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving consistency of AADL models: A composition approach

Hamdane

Harous

Kerkouche

et al. 2023

Systems Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AADL—architecture analysis and design language—has proven to be important in developing real‐time embedded systems. However, its formalization capability is still limited, which makes it difficult to produce a consistent model; particularly, in the case where several models are combined together. Therefore, using formal verification is an effective way to meet the consistency requirements of the AADL model. This paper proposes a model‐based engineering approach that uses timed automata (TA) formalism to aggregate multiple AADL models into a single composite model. Based on the set of input AADL models, the proposed approach creates a consistent composed model as well as support model checking verification. The effectiveness of this contribution is evaluated through two case studies; a multicamera surveillance system and a drone system.

show abstract

Programming - What is Next?

Havelund

Steffen

2021

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HAMR: An AADL Multi-platform Code Generation Toolset

Cited by 14 publications

References 8 publications

Is Formal Verification of seL4 Adequate to Address the Key Security Challenges of Kernel Design?

Is Formal Verification of seL4 Adequate to Address the Key Security Challenges of Kernel Design?

Improving consistency of AADL models: A composition approach

Programming - What is Next?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About