2009
DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3181b764b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halothane-induced Hypnosis Is Not Accompanied by Inactivation of Orexinergic Output in Rodents

Abstract: Background One underexploited property of anesthetics is their ability to probe neuronal regulation of arousal. At appropriate doses, anesthetics reversibly obtund conscious perception. However, individual anesthetic agents may accomplish this by altering the function of distinct neuronal populations. Previously we showed that isoflurane and sevoflurane inhibit orexinergic neurons, delaying reintegration of sensory perception as denoted by emergence. Herein we study the effects of halothane. As a halogenated a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, as also mentioned previously, halothane (1.5%) was found to preserve the spinal and supraspinal patterns of c-fos induced by mechanical stimulations (Novikova et al, 2004). Halothane anesthesia also did not alter Fos expression in orexin-containing neurons compared with spontaneously breathing animals over 2 h exposure (Gompf et al, 2009). Although these results do not permit to rule out an effect of anesthesia on Fos induction in our study, they however argue against a role of anesthesia as a main confounding factor in the interpretation of results.…”
Section: Fos Inductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Similarly, as also mentioned previously, halothane (1.5%) was found to preserve the spinal and supraspinal patterns of c-fos induced by mechanical stimulations (Novikova et al, 2004). Halothane anesthesia also did not alter Fos expression in orexin-containing neurons compared with spontaneously breathing animals over 2 h exposure (Gompf et al, 2009). Although these results do not permit to rule out an effect of anesthesia on Fos induction in our study, they however argue against a role of anesthesia as a main confounding factor in the interpretation of results.…”
Section: Fos Inductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…67-69 Halothane has also been shown to cause less depression of the cortical electroencephalogram compared to isoflurane, 70,71 which may be caused in part, by halothane's persistent activation of the wake-active locus coeuruleus and orexinergic neurons. 72 Consequently, halothane's failure to stimulate GABAergic MnPO neurons is not entirely surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 Different anesthetics also undoubtedly act on distinct molecular and anatomical components of sleep circuitry to varying degrees. 55,72,78-80 From a functional standpoint, the volatile anesthetics distinguish themselves from natural sleep by their accumulation of rapid eye movement sleep debt and inability to relieve pre-existing rapid eye movement debt during exposure. 81-83 Though sleep and anesthetic induced unconsciousness are clearly distinct states, our findings are consistent with a role for an endogenous sleep-promoting GABAergic neuronal population in the VLPO in genesis of volatile general anesthetic hypnosis but fail to confirm an invariant contribution of MnPO neuronal populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivery of NE directly to the nucleus basalis, another node in sleep-wake circuits and one of many regions that receive NE innervation from the LC, produces transient microarousals in desflurane-anesthetized rats, supporting a role for NE in emergence functions (7). Although elimination of LC-NE discharge is not necessary for volatile anesthetic action (15,30), increases in LC activity and central NE levels after cessation of halothane anesthesia have been documented (31,32). In addition, during halothane anesthesia, LC discharge rate has been positively correlated with arousal-related changes in cortical and hippocampal EEG (8,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%