2002
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-52-1-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halomonas alimentaria sp. nov., isolated from jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

7
84
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fatty acid profile of strain SS20 T was characterized as containing saturated and unsaturated straight-fatty acids such as C 18 : 1 v7c, C 19 : 0 v8c cyclo and C 16 : 0 (Table 2). The fatty acid composition on MA was slightly different from that on MA supplemented with 5 % NaCl (w/v), as reported previously (Arahal et al, 2001;Bouchotroch et al, 2001;Franzmann & Tindall, 1990;Valderrama et al, 1998;Yoon et al, 2001Yoon et al, , 2002). However, the major fatty acid profile of strain SS20 T was similar to those of other members of the genus Halomonas, but was distinguishable from that of the genus Zymobacter, the closest phylogenetic neighbour Table 1.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fatty acid profile of strain SS20 T was characterized as containing saturated and unsaturated straight-fatty acids such as C 18 : 1 v7c, C 19 : 0 v8c cyclo and C 16 : 0 (Table 2). The fatty acid composition on MA was slightly different from that on MA supplemented with 5 % NaCl (w/v), as reported previously (Arahal et al, 2001;Bouchotroch et al, 2001;Franzmann & Tindall, 1990;Valderrama et al, 1998;Yoon et al, 2001Yoon et al, , 2002). However, the major fatty acid profile of strain SS20 T was similar to those of other members of the genus Halomonas, but was distinguishable from that of the genus Zymobacter, the closest phylogenetic neighbour Table 1.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…70 67-68 60?7-64?2 6 3 6 2 ?2-64?1 60?5 6 6 ?7 6 5 ?7 (Arahal et al, 2001;Bouchotroch et al, 2001;Franzmann & Tindall, 1990;Okamoto et al, 1993;Yoon et al, 2002).…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major components (.10 % of total fatty acids) were C 19 : 0 cyclo v8c and C 16 : 0 (see Supplementary Table S1 in IJSEM Online). The profiles were similar to those of the type strains of previously described species belonging to the genera Modicisalibacter, Chromohalobacter, Halomonas and Cobetia, confirming the position of these strains in the family Halomonadaceae (Yoon et al, 2002;Peçonek et al, 2006). However, the relative amount of C 19 : 0 cyclo v8c was notably higher than that observed in most species of the family Halomonadaceae.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…At the time of writing, the family Halomonadaceae belonging to the class Gammaproteobacteria consists of nine halophilic genera with validly published names (Aidingimonas, Chromohalobacter, Cobetia, Halomonas, Halotalea, Kushneria, Modicisalibacter, Salinicola and Larsenimonas) (Vreeland et al, 1980;Ventosa et al, 1989;Mellado et al, 1995;Arahal et al, 2002;Arahal & Ventosa, 2006;Gam et al, 2007;Ntougias et al, 2007;Sánchez-Porro et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009;Leó n et al, 2015) that are capable of growth in saline environments with 15 % (w/v) salt concentrations plus two nonhalophilic genera (Carnimonas and Zymobacter) (Okamoto et al, 1993;Garriga et al, 1998). Among the genera, the genus Halomonas including Gram-stain-negative, moderately halophilic, aerobic or facultatively aerobic rod-shaped bacteria is the largest genus, which includes 90 species with validly published names that have been isolated from diverse saline environments such as solar salterns, salt lakes, fermented seafood, sea squirts, sea ice, hydrothermal vents and saline-alkali soil (Vreeland et al, 1980;Ventosa et al, 1998;Romanenko et al, 2002;Yoon et al, 2002;Kaye et al, 2004;Lim et al, 2004;Arenas et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010;Guan et al, 2010;Guzmán et al, 2010;Jeong et al, 2013;Miao et al, 2014). Because members of the genus Halomonas are phenotypically diverse and have an unusually wide range of DNA G+C contents (52-74.3 mol%), they are being split into different genera (Arahal et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%