2021
DOI: 10.31223/x54w3r
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halokinetic modulation of sedimentary thickness and architecture: a numerical modelling approach

Abstract: Subsurface salt flow can deform overlying strata and influence contemporaneous sedimentary processes. Studying salt-sediment interactions is challenging in the subsurface due to poor imaging adjacent to salt, and in the field due to the dissolution of halite. Discrete Element Modelling provides an efficient and inexpensive tool to model stratigraphy and deformation around salt structures, which is advantageous over other modelling techniques as it realistically recreates brittle processes such as faulting. Six… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rejuvenation led to slight rotation of the mini‐basins and made the potential near‐diapir stratigraphic traps to become steeper and the late Triassic–mid Jurassic reservoirs (within sequence S4) at the centre of the mini‐basins to become more tilted (Figures 13A7–B7, 14A15, 15A7–B7 and 16A7–B7). The steeper and tilted units are likely to develop over‐pressure due to the upward rotation of strata, creating a large pressure head with top seal rocks that are unable to hold back a significant hydrocarbon column (Cumberpatch et al., 2021; Giles & Rowan, 2012; Heidari et al., 2019). Finally, the Cenozoic shelf uplift eroded post‐middle Triassic to Eocene successions depending on the individual salt structure dynamics and increased the risk of leakage of significant volumes of hydrocarbons for possible earlier traps in the Nordkapp Basin (Figures 13A8–B8, 14A16, 15A8–B8 and 16A8–B8; Baig et al., 2016; Grimstad, 2016; Rojo et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rejuvenation led to slight rotation of the mini‐basins and made the potential near‐diapir stratigraphic traps to become steeper and the late Triassic–mid Jurassic reservoirs (within sequence S4) at the centre of the mini‐basins to become more tilted (Figures 13A7–B7, 14A15, 15A7–B7 and 16A7–B7). The steeper and tilted units are likely to develop over‐pressure due to the upward rotation of strata, creating a large pressure head with top seal rocks that are unable to hold back a significant hydrocarbon column (Cumberpatch et al., 2021; Giles & Rowan, 2012; Heidari et al., 2019). Finally, the Cenozoic shelf uplift eroded post‐middle Triassic to Eocene successions depending on the individual salt structure dynamics and increased the risk of leakage of significant volumes of hydrocarbons for possible earlier traps in the Nordkapp Basin (Figures 13A8–B8, 14A16, 15A8–B8 and 16A8–B8; Baig et al., 2016; Grimstad, 2016; Rojo et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%