2017
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-1557-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halogen chemistry reduces tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> radiative forcing

Abstract: Abstract. Tropospheric ozone (O 3 ) is a global warming gas, but the lack of a firm observational record since the preindustrial period means that estimates of its radiative forcing (RF TO 3 ) rely on model calculations. Recent observational evidence shows that halogens are pervasive in the troposphere and need to be represented in chemistry-transport models for an accurate simulation of present-day O 3 . Using the GEOSChem model we show that tropospheric halogen chemistry is likely more active in the present… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, below 9.5 km altitude BrO could not be detected above the detection limit. The amount and distribution of halogen oxides such as BrO (panel e) in the troposphere is a matter of current debate (Harder et al, 1998;Fitzenberger et al, 2000;Saiz-Lopez and von Glasow, 2012;Volkamer et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Schmidt et al, 2016;Sherwen et al, 2016;Werner et al, 2017) and is of significant scientific interest due to its potential influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry (von Glasow et al, 2004) and thus radiative forcing (Sherwen et al, 2017). Reported tropospheric background profiles at polar latitudes include those by Fitzenberger et al (2000), who derive tropospheric BrO profiles above Kiruna (Sweden) from balloon measurements and conclude that tropospheric [BrO] amounting to 0.4-2.3 ppt was present, assuming a uniform distribution within the troposphere.…”
Section: Sample Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, below 9.5 km altitude BrO could not be detected above the detection limit. The amount and distribution of halogen oxides such as BrO (panel e) in the troposphere is a matter of current debate (Harder et al, 1998;Fitzenberger et al, 2000;Saiz-Lopez and von Glasow, 2012;Volkamer et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Schmidt et al, 2016;Sherwen et al, 2016;Werner et al, 2017) and is of significant scientific interest due to its potential influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry (von Glasow et al, 2004) and thus radiative forcing (Sherwen et al, 2017). Reported tropospheric background profiles at polar latitudes include those by Fitzenberger et al (2000), who derive tropospheric BrO profiles above Kiruna (Sweden) from balloon measurements and conclude that tropospheric [BrO] amounting to 0.4-2.3 ppt was present, assuming a uniform distribution within the troposphere.…”
Section: Sample Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work uses GEOS‐Chem (http://www.geos-chem.org) version v10 at 4° × 5° resolution with a coupled halogen chemistry scheme as described and evaluated for present day [ Sherwen et al , ] and for the preindustrial [ Sherwen et al , ]. This incorporates previous halogen development in GEOS‐Chem [ Bell et al , ; Eastham et al , ; Parrella et al , ; Sherwen et al , ; Schmidt et al , ], with gas‐phase chemistry based on Jet Propulsion Laboratory/International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry recommendations [ Sander et al , ; Atkinson et al , , , ] and heterogeneous chemistry from previous work [ Abbatt et al , ; Braban et al , ; Ammann et al , ; Sherwen et al , ].…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To probe the possible changes of iodine aerosol between preindustrial and the present day, the model was also run with preindustrial emissions as described previously [ Parrella et al , ; Sherwen et al , ]. Anthropogenic emissions of O 3 precursors are switched off and natural emissions maintained at their present day values.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottom figure from NAB O 3 simulation described in Lin et al, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309.f3 chemistry (Sherwen et al, 2017) or dry deposition (e.g., Val Martin et al, 2014)). Some of the studies in Table S1 have attempted to bias-correct USB or NAB O 3 estimates by simply assuming the bias is entirely due to USB O 3 (Lin et al, 2012b) or by assuming that the relative model contributions from individual sources are accurate such that USB O 3 is adjusted proportionally to its contribution to total simulated O 3 (Dolwick et al, 2015).…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Distributions Of Usb Omentioning
confidence: 99%