2018
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halo-independent comparison of direct detection experiments in the effective theory of dark matter-nucleon interactions

Abstract: The theoretical interpretation of dark matter direct detection experiments is hindered by uncertainties of the microphysics governing the dark matter-nucleon interaction, and of the dark matter density and velocity distribution inside the Solar System. These uncertainties are especially relevant when confronting a detection claim to the null results from other experiments, since seemingly conflicting experimental results may be reconciled when relaxing the assumptions about the form of the interaction and/or t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should also remark that the SHM provides a simplified approximate description of the DM galactic distribution, challenged by the results from the most recent DM hydrodynamical simulations, including the effects of baryons [290,291], as well as by observational evidences from the GAIA collaboration [292][293][294]. Notice that a proper assessment of the astrophysical inputs is also crucial when the outcome of different experiments is compared; this problem can nevertheless be encompassed through the so-called halo independent methods [295][296][297][298][299][300][301].…”
Section: Uncertainties and Caveats In The Comparison Of Dm Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should also remark that the SHM provides a simplified approximate description of the DM galactic distribution, challenged by the results from the most recent DM hydrodynamical simulations, including the effects of baryons [290,291], as well as by observational evidences from the GAIA collaboration [292][293][294]. Notice that a proper assessment of the astrophysical inputs is also crucial when the outcome of different experiments is compared; this problem can nevertheless be encompassed through the so-called halo independent methods [295][296][297][298][299][300][301].…”
Section: Uncertainties and Caveats In The Comparison Of Dm Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…value of the modulation amplitude allowed by present constraints, i.e. to take S DAMA,max m,n in » n as a free parameter and find the minimal value Ŝ DAMA,max m,n for which the condition (25) is verified [27,28]. A schematic view of the intersection between the c T DAMA m,n (m χ , δ)/ Ŝ DAMA,max m,n c = 1 ellipse and the edge of the experimentally allowed volume in the coupling constants space is provided in Fig.…”
Section: Wimp Inelastic Scattering In Non-relativistic Effective Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this factorization in the effective field theory parameter space the surfaces of constant signal in different detectors are ellipsoids, and, as discussed in Refs. [27,28], the determination of their geometrical intersections allows to efficiently compare the results of various direct detection experiments in the high-dimensional parameter space of the non-relativistic effective theory, without making any a priori assumptions regarding the relative size of the various Wilson coefficients c τ k . In this way for a standard halo model the DAMA/LIBRA-phase1 result [1][2][3] was shown to be incompatible to the constraints from other experiments in the case of elastic interactions of a WIMP particle with spin ≤ 1/2 and the interaction Hamiltonian of Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we take the astrophysical parameters 1 from [32] (the impact of the astrophysical uncertainties is considered, e.g., in [33][34][35]). Our focus lies on the cross section dσ=dq 2 , which for the leading isoscalar SI interaction reads dσ dq…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%