2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.06.09.493773
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hallucinating protein assemblies

Abstract: Deep learning generative approaches provide an opportunity to broadly explore protein structure space beyond the sequences and structures of natural proteins. Here we use deep network hallucination to generate a wide range of symmetric protein homo-oligomers given only a specification of the number of protomers and the protomer length. Crystal structures of 7 designs are very close to the computational models (median RMSD: 0.6 Å), as are 3 cryoEM structures of giant rings with up to 1550 residues, C33 symmetry… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When evaluating AlphaFold2 and RosettaFold on single sequences by ablating the multiple sequence alignment, performance degrades substantially, and falls well below that of ESMFold. Note that this is an artificial setting as AlphaFold2 has not been explicitly trained for single sequences, however it has recently emerged as important in protein design, where these models have been used with single sequence inputs for de novo protein design (42)(43)(44).…”
Section: Accelerating Accurate Atomic Resolution Structure Prediction...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating AlphaFold2 and RosettaFold on single sequences by ablating the multiple sequence alignment, performance degrades substantially, and falls well below that of ESMFold. Note that this is an artificial setting as AlphaFold2 has not been explicitly trained for single sequences, however it has recently emerged as important in protein design, where these models have been used with single sequence inputs for de novo protein design (42)(43)(44).…”
Section: Accelerating Accurate Atomic Resolution Structure Prediction...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 There are also other approaches to finding peptide binders that do not involve BO. 85,86 Figure 6 shows the BO of Equation 11 averaged across 5 runs with variable sequence length. We compared against results from Anupam Patgiri [81] , which experimentally found the peptide FEGIYRLELLKAEEAN to bind well to Ras GTPase.…”
Section: Alphafold2 Protein-peptide Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80 There are also other approaches to finding peptide binders that do not involve BO. 81,82 Figure 6 shows the BO of Equation 11 averaged across 10 runs with variable sequence length. The algorithm found better binders than the known binder from Anupam Patgiri [77] (FEGIYRLELLKAEEAN) based on wild type (WT) SoS protein.…”
Section: Alphafold2 Protein-peptide Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29] In principle, recent progress in the synthesis of colloidal-scale particles with programmed shape can allow for tunable shape frustration that can more fully test the continuum theory description of size control. 30,31 Notably, advances in DNA nanotechnology 32,33 as well as synthetic protein engineering [34][35][36][37] allow for both careful design and control of the shape frustration of self-assembling nanoscale units as well as new opportunities for programming the interactions to separately tune the strength of cohesion and costs associated with distinct modes of assembly deformation. However, due to the primary reliance on continuum descriptions of GFA, several basic challenges remain to relate emergent thermodynamic behaviors in a particular system of self-assembling frustrated subunits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%