1986
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(86)90219-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hall-petch strengthening for the microhardness of twelve nanometer grain diameter electrodeposited nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we have used the XRD grain size, d, to compile the Hall-Petch plot shown in Figure 10, which shows the Vicker's microhardness (H) as a function of d 1/2 . For comparison with the present data, we have also included data from nominally pure Ni [10,11,[61][62][63] and Co. [57] At grain sizes above ϳ15 nm (to the left of Figure 10), we see that all of the data from the present study (Ni-80Co), as well as from prior literature on pure Ni and Co, fall into a reasonably common trend that follows the expected Hall-Petch scaling. This result confirms the expectations developed previously, and supports the notion that twin boundaries are effective Hall-Petch strengtheners.…”
Section: Role Of Grain Boundary Character On Hardness Trendsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, we have used the XRD grain size, d, to compile the Hall-Petch plot shown in Figure 10, which shows the Vicker's microhardness (H) as a function of d 1/2 . For comparison with the present data, we have also included data from nominally pure Ni [10,11,[61][62][63] and Co. [57] At grain sizes above ϳ15 nm (to the left of Figure 10), we see that all of the data from the present study (Ni-80Co), as well as from prior literature on pure Ni and Co, fall into a reasonably common trend that follows the expected Hall-Petch scaling. This result confirms the expectations developed previously, and supports the notion that twin boundaries are effective Hall-Petch strengtheners.…”
Section: Role Of Grain Boundary Character On Hardness Trendsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The presence of lattice fringes up to the boundary suggests that there is no amorphous film at the boundaries in this alloy. [10,11,[61][62][63] and pure Co. [57] The dashed trend lines are present for illustrative purposes only.…”
Section: Role Of Grain Boundary Character On Hardness Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, α phase laths frequently occupying the β grain boundaries aligned to the shear direction. This grain refinement consequently lead to an approximate 50% increase in hardness from that of the starting material, primarily due to locally enhanced Hall-Petch strengthening [18]. In regions adjacent to the fine equiaxed zone, there is a transition to firstly larger elongated β grains with α laths aligned to the shear direction, and then to larger diamond shaped β grains with α phase often located on their diagonal axes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, according to the previous work [3] , the change of grain structure directly results in an uncertainty of surface material property and affects severely machining quality. During cutting process, the most commonly method to reveal the interactive relation between surface properties and microstructure is Hall-Petch (H-P) equation [28][29] . However, models on size effect remains proportional to internal grain, which cannot obtain an accurate evolution mechanism of microscopic deformation field and mechanical properties of grain refining in most of studies [30] .…”
Section: The Effect Of Grain Size On Microscopic Deformation Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%