1967
DOI: 10.1016/0032-1028(67)90017-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hall effect influence on a highly conducting fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metallic (nonresistive) electrodes. For a homogeneous plasma, it has been shown (Witalis, 1965) that high current concentrations occur on the edges of metallic electrodes. But in the presence of cold boundary layers of lower electrical conductivity, the present calculations show that the nonuniformity in current distribution is considerably reduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metallic (nonresistive) electrodes. For a homogeneous plasma, it has been shown (Witalis, 1965) that high current concentrations occur on the edges of metallic electrodes. But in the presence of cold boundary layers of lower electrical conductivity, the present calculations show that the nonuniformity in current distribution is considerably reduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a segmented Faraday M H D generator, the anisotropic nature of plasma conductivity induces nonuniformities in current distribution, so that a one-dimensional model of current in the Faraday direction is inadequate for predicting the electrical performance of the generator. Calculations o n the two-dimensional current distribution in a M H D generator have been carried out by Haines (1967), Hurwitz et al (1961), Matsunaga (1965) and Witalis (1965) by conformal mapping, and Celenskii and Fischer (1966) and Crown (1961) by a numerical technique. Other calculations for nonequilibrium plasmas have been carried out by Oliver and Mitchner (1967) and Uncles (1973), including the effect of current induced inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%