2010
DOI: 10.1021/om100324m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half-Sandwich Tungsten Complexes with Metal- and η5-Cyclopentadienyl-Bound Functional Stannyl Groups and Their Transformation into Ansa Complexes

Abstract: We report the introduction of two stannyl groups into a half-sandwich tungsten complex and their subsequent functionalization in order to generate useful precursors for the formation of diverse ansatype tungsten complexes. Bis-stannylation is achieved by treatment of the dilithiated species Li-[W(η 5 -C 5 H 4 Li)(CO) 3 ] (7) with 2 equiv of Me 3 SnCl, yielding [{Me 3 Sn(η 5 -C 5 H 4 )}(OC) 3 W(SnMe 3 )] (8). Successive chlorination is achieved by use of Me 2 SnCl 2 and SnCl 4 3 2OEt 2 and enables the selective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ring strain within the ansa bridge provides the driving force for cleavage reactions of the tinetin bond, such as the insertion of elemental chalcogens [32,33,38,39]. Therefore, 2 was treated with sulphur, grey selenium and elemental tellurium to yield the desired 1,3-distanna-2-chalcogena-ansa compounds in good yields of 61e75% (Scheme 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ring strain within the ansa bridge provides the driving force for cleavage reactions of the tinetin bond, such as the insertion of elemental chalcogens [32,33,38,39]. Therefore, 2 was treated with sulphur, grey selenium and elemental tellurium to yield the desired 1,3-distanna-2-chalcogena-ansa compounds in good yields of 61e75% (Scheme 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C-Sn-C bond angles range from 96.2(3) to 104.4(3)°and are on average (100.8°) as expected larger than for the free [Sn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 ] -[91.3(av)°]. However, the Sn-Zn-Sn angle of 158.04(4)°clearly deviates from linearity, which is due to additional interactions 255.29 (6) [W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SnMe 3 )}(SnMe 3 )] [12] 284.81(5) [W(CO) 3 Cp(SnClBu 2 )] [13] 279.59(5) [W(CO) 3 Cp(SnClMe 2 )] [13] 278.66(3) [W(CO) 3 Cp{Sn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 }] 273.94(6) [W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SnClMe 2 )}(SnCl 2 Me)] [12] 272.56(3) [W(CO) 3 Cp(SnCl 3 )] [13] 272.44 (3) [Fe(CO) 2 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SiMe 3 )}{Sn(OH) t Bu 2 }] [14] 253.4(1) [Fe(CO) 2 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SiMe 3 )}(SnCl t Bu 2 )] [14] 252.9(2) [Fe(CO) 2 Cp{Sn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 }] 247.18(4) [Fe(CO) 2 Cp(SnCl 2 Ph)] [15] 246.7(2) [Fe(CO) 2 Cp(SnBr 3 )] [16] 246.2 (2) [Ni(CO) 3 between the zinc atom and three fluorine atoms of two ancillary [Zn{Sn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 } 2 ] (1) molecules which range from 265.8(6) pm to 275.8(5) pm. The Sn-C bond lengths, which range from 221.1(9) pm to 223.5(9) pm, experience a shortening with respect to the anion [Sn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 ] -[226.5(av) pm], and nicely matches with the corresponding distances in the stannane HSn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 [220.6(av) pm].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (C 2 H 4 NMe 2 )}(SnCy 3 )] [21] 1987, 1911, 1891 [W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (C 2 H 4 NMe 2 )}(SnPh 3 )] [21] 1992, 1916, 1894 [W(CO) 3 Cp*(SnClMe 2 )] [13] 1997, 1927, 1901 [W(CO) 3 Cp(SnClBu 2 )] [13] 1999, 1981 [W(CO) 3 Cp(SnClMe 2 )] [13] 2010, 1940, 1911 [W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SnMe 3 )}(SnClMe 2 )] [12] 2010, 1940, 1911 [W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SnClMe 2 )}(SnClMe 2 )] [12] 2016, 1944, 1915 [W(CO) 3 {η 5 -C 5 H 4 (SnMe 3 )}(SnMe 3 )] [12] 2016, 1947, 1915 [W(CO) 3 Cp{Sn(C 2 F 5 ) 3 …”
Section: }] 2043 1981 1958mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WRC bond-length of W1-C1 1.834(4) Å, is unremarkable, falling within the normal range for neopentylidyne complexes although all previous structural studies involved this ligand bound to high-valent tungsten. While there are copious structural data available for tungsten stannyl complexes, the only two trimethylstannyl examples [W(SnMe 3 )(CO) 2 (Z-C 5 H 4 SnMe 3 )] (W-Sn = 2.8481(5) Å) 12 and [W(SnMe 3 )(CO) 5 ] À (2.810(8) Å) 13 have far shorter W-Sn bonds than found in 2 (2.9332(3) Å), a manifestation of the superlative trans influence of carbyne ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%