2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-021-01698-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haldane’s formula in Cannings models: the case of moderately strong selection

Abstract: For a class of Cannings models we prove Haldane’s formula, $$\pi (s_N) \sim \frac{2s_N}{\rho ^2}$$ π ( s N ) ∼ 2 s N … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mutants with substantial selective advantage, namely for st ≫ 1 /K here, extinction events happen when mutants are still rare, due to stochastic fluctuations associated to sampling. Indeed, in a well-mixed population, if their fraction reaches a given threshold, beneficial mutants are very likely to fix in the end [78, 79]. Therefore, the branching process approach yields accurate results on extinction probabilities and extinction times provided that K ≫ 1 and Kst ≫ 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mutants with substantial selective advantage, namely for st ≫ 1 /K here, extinction events happen when mutants are still rare, due to stochastic fluctuations associated to sampling. Indeed, in a well-mixed population, if their fraction reaches a given threshold, beneficial mutants are very likely to fix in the end [78, 79]. Therefore, the branching process approach yields accurate results on extinction probabilities and extinction times provided that K ≫ 1 and Kst ≫ 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the scaling Assumption A1 for s and N reflects the fact that, compared to diffusion approximations when K = 1, in our model selection is stronger than random genetic drift. In Boenkost et al (2021), Assumption A1 with K > 2 is called moderately strong selection and used to prove that the fixation probability of a single mutant in Cannings models is asymptotically equivalent to 2( σ − 1) /v (in our notation) as N → ∞. The first requirement in Assumption A2 implies that (see Remark 3.3).…”
Section: Evolution Of the Phenotypic Mean And Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Boenkost et al (2021) We denote the values of Ḡ(τ ) and V G (τ ) in the quasi-stationary phase by Ḡ * (τ ) and V * G , respectively. For notational simplicity, we set ν = ν(s, α, N ) = N P sur (e sα ) .…”
Section: Approximations For the Quasi-stationary Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c N ∼ N (a N )/a N ∼ (a N )/ * (a N ) → 0 as N → ∞. Thanks to the monotonicity property (5) this formula is only needed for j ∈ {1, 2} in the previous proof.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 1 (Vi) Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same multinomial scheme with an additional dormancy mechanism is considered in the recent work by Cordero et al [8]. A class of Dirichlet models in the domain of attraction of the Kingman coalescent is also studied in two recent works by Boenkost et al [4,5] with an emphasis on Haldane's formula [14]. We refer the reader to Athreya [1] for some more information on Haldane's formula.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%