"Hair texture" is a quality frequently included among the morphological observations made during anthropometric studies, and it is often listed as a characteristic useful in human taxonomy. Ratings of hair texture are available for a number of populations, population sub-groups, and for groups with varying degrees of recent admixture. Yet, despite the frequent appearance of the term hair texture in the American anthropological literature, it is difficult to find a satisfactory definition of the term, description of the categories that can be distinguished, or attempts to test the reliability of the ratings.
DEFINITION O F HAIR TEXTURERiplcy ('10, p. 457) considered hair texture to be identical with hair form, for he wrote: "The two extremes of hair texture in the human species are the crisp, curly variety so familiar to us in the African Negro; and the stiff, wiry hair of the Asiatic and the American aborigines. " Nore recently Kroeber ( '18, p. 129) used the term in much the same way and after referring to Pruner-Bey 's attempted correlation of hair form and the cross-section index, he makes the interesting statement that "hair texture seems to run rather rigidly along hereditary, racial lines, and to be uninfluenced by factors of age, sex, climate or nourishment." Turney-High follows Kroeber very closely, and distinguishes three categories of hair texture (in terms of hair form) and also asserts that hair Those who use the term hair texture to describe hair form are in the minority, however, and a larger number of anthropologists apparently make the term synononious with hair thickness, and consider hair form a separate variable. Though Hooton does not define the term in U p f r o m f7w A p e , the Harvard anthropometric blank reproduced on page 750 of that work contains, under the morphological observations, three categories for texture : coarse, medium and fine (Hooton, '46), and Hooton states (personal communication) that the term texture as used by him always refers to the coarseness or thickness of the hair. Davenport's short guide to anthropometry also listed three categories of hair texture -soft, intermediate and coarse, and he reprinted an earlier version of the Harvard blank with the same three categories mentioned above (Davenport, '27, p. 50). While Hrdlicka did not define hair texture in his manual (HrdliEka, '39), he used the categories coarse or thick, medium, and fine in his study of Old Americans, and in his report on members of the National Academy of Sciences (Hrdlirka, '25, '40). Krogman, in his essay on the concept of race, refers to the same three categories of hair texture (Krogman, '45, p. 50) and Herskovits has adapted the table containing those categories in his recent text (Herskovits, '49, p. 147). Anthropologists trained by Hooton rate texture indepeiidently of form, and use the same three categories (Williams, '31 ; Seltzer, '36 ; Lasker, '46 ; Kelly, '47; Angel, '49; Gabel, '49). Investigators who have made microscopical studies of hair also use the term texture as a synonym for t...