2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hair removal and bioavailability of chemicals: Effect of physicochemical properties of drugs and surfactants on skin permeation ex vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 31 A subsequent study by the same group using model drugs with various physicochemical properties showed all hair removal methods enhanced skin permeation to varying degrees, with no discernable pattern indicating that any technique was superior to another. 32 However, depilation cream did not enhance the dermal flux of fluconazole (LogP of 0.45 ± 0.84) and thus may not improve the partitioning of hydrophilic NM into the skin. The electric clipping method used in the current studies is distinct from dry shaving as it removes most of the hair shaft without exposing the skin surface directly to the razors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 31 A subsequent study by the same group using model drugs with various physicochemical properties showed all hair removal methods enhanced skin permeation to varying degrees, with no discernable pattern indicating that any technique was superior to another. 32 However, depilation cream did not enhance the dermal flux of fluconazole (LogP of 0.45 ± 0.84) and thus may not improve the partitioning of hydrophilic NM into the skin. The electric clipping method used in the current studies is distinct from dry shaving as it removes most of the hair shaft without exposing the skin surface directly to the razors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dry shaving, electric epilation, and waxing resulted in a moderate reduction in barrier function, whereas depilation cream and wet shaving did not 31 . A subsequent study by the same group using model drugs with various physicochemical properties showed all hair removal methods enhanced skin permeation to varying degrees, with no discernable pattern indicating that any technique was superior to another 32 . However, depilation cream did not enhance the dermal flux of fluconazole (LogP of 0.45 ± 0.84) and thus may not improve the partitioning of hydrophilic NM into the skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, potential changes in SC thickness due to physical removal of corneocytes have to be taken into account in data evaluation. 97,98 In a recent study, the effect of iontophoresis and sonophoresis on barrier function alone and in combination with a chemical enhancer was shown for a model permeant using mouse skin and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy 99 ; the best option for oxaprozin delivery was found to be sonophoresis combined with azone as enhancer.…”
Section: Skin Composition Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the effect of chemical stressors, the impact of physical procedures such as tape stripping, microneedling or hair removal, is possible, but less promising since not all physical stressors evoke significant changes in the chemical composition of the skin. In addition, potential changes in SC thickness due to physical removal of corneocytes have to be taken into account in data evaluation 97,98 . In a recent study, the effect of iontophoresis and sonophoresis on barrier function alone and in combination with a chemical enhancer was shown for a model permeant using mouse skin and surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy 99 ; the best option for oxaprozin delivery was found to be sonophoresis combined with azone as enhancer.…”
Section: Utilization Of Raman Spectroscopy In Skin Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive tool in skin research and caught increasing attention for skin characterizations such as skin penetration and permeation of topically applied materials [24,25]. CRS is also an efficient and label-free method and has been increasingly used to study the macroscopic alterations of skin properties with humidity changes, age difference and hair removal comparisons [26][27][28]. Detailed information about biochemical molecules can be obtained from CRS, including the chemical structure, phase and molecular interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%