2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hair as a matrix to evaluate cumulative and aggregate exposure to pesticides in winegrowers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, there are no epidemiologic data existing about blood concentration levels after exposure in humans. The exposure to pesticides in farmers and the general population living close to a treated area is mostly evaluated through quantification of pesticides in hair [ 40 , 41 ]. Our results call for such biomonitoring to evaluate the real level of exposure and to drive future research with a range of concentrations established experimentally rather than theoretically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we know, there are no epidemiologic data existing about blood concentration levels after exposure in humans. The exposure to pesticides in farmers and the general population living close to a treated area is mostly evaluated through quantification of pesticides in hair [ 40 , 41 ]. Our results call for such biomonitoring to evaluate the real level of exposure and to drive future research with a range of concentrations established experimentally rather than theoretically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the concentrations of 170 active ingredients and derivative metabolites in hair samples from 50 adult Andean individuals living in rural and urban areas, using validated analytical methods 31 . Hair matrix has proven to be efficient in assessing pesticide exposure over a period covering weeks to months 32 , 33 , despite not providing toxicokinetic information. Moreover, the hair matrix offers another advantage in epidemiological studies, as it is not sensitive to intraday variabilities like urine and plasma compartments 34 , 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hair matrix has proven to be efficient in assessing pesticide exposure over a period covering weeks to months 32,33 , despite not providing toxicokinetic information. Moreover, the hair matrix offers another advantage in epidemiological studies, as it is not sensitive to intraday variabilities like urine and plasma compartments 34,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results showed a limited detection window of urine for long‐term biomonitoring of occupational exposure to glyphosate. On the contrary, hair testing has been presented as the best approach to document long‐term or regular consumption or exposure to many pesticides (Çelik et al, 2021; Polledri et al, 2019). It is now well admitted that hair presents an average linear growth of 1 cm per month, indicating that each centimeter of hair represents a cumulative exposure to the compound during 1 month (LeBeau et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, hair sampling is noninvasive and easy to practice. Studies in the general population to evaluate actual exposures via diet and above all in occupationally exposed workers (glyphosate sprayers like farmers but also glyphosate production workers) are needed, and hair testing could be of great interest in these studies, as demonstrated with other pesticides (Polledri et al, 2019). However, to our knowledge, glyphosate has never been tested in hair.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%