Haemophilia prophylactic treatment in Spain

Haematomas and recurrent haemarthroses are a common problem in haemophilia patients from early age. Early diagnosis is critical in preventing haemophilic arthritis, and recent years have seen excellent advances in musculoskeletal ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in soft tissue lesions. In this study, we compared the results of ultrasound imaging for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal injuries in haemophilia patients with scores obtained using magnetic resonance (MRI) scans. A total of 61 haemophilia patients aged 4-82 years were included in this study. Both knees and ankles of each patient were assessed using the Gilbert (clinical assessment) and Pettersson scores (X-ray assessment). Patients with severe haemophilia (n = 30) were examined using ultrasound and MRI (Denver scoring system). Results obtained with ultrasound and MRI in severe patients were correlated using the Pearson test. In patients with severe haemophilia, normal joints were similarly assessed with MRI and ultrasound (κ = 1.000). By component of joint assessment, haemarthrosis was similarly diagnosed with both techniques in all joints (κ = 1.000). A good positive correlation was found between these techniques in detecting and locating synovial hyperplasia (κ = 0.839-1.000, knees and ankles respectively), and erosion of margins (κ = 0.850-1.000). The presence of bone cysts or cartilage loss was better detected with MRI (κ = 0.643-0.552 for knees and ankles, and κ = 0.643-0.462 respectively). Ultrasound is useful in detecting joint bleeds, synovial hyperplasia and joint erosions, with results comparable to those of MRI. A quick and affordable technique, ultrasound imaging may be useful for monitoring joint bleeds and structure normalization and maintenance in routine practice.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and follow‐up of joint lesions in patients with haemophilia

et al. 2013

“…Forty‐eight studies reported between 1982 and 2003 with 2704 patients receiving a total of 2973 CVADs were included in the meta‐analysis (Table 1) [2–4,6,7,9–22,27–55]. None of the studies was unpublished.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The median number of patients with CVADs per study was 15 (IQR, . In 19 of the included studies the numbers of haemophilic patients who did not receive CVADs were also reported [3,4,9,11,13,17,19,33,34,36,37,42,[45][46][47][48]50,51,54], and the median percentage of patients receiving CVADs per study was 28.6% (IQR, 11.0-52.0%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Central venous access devices in haemophilia

Valentino

Ewenstein

Navickis³

et al. 2004

138

182

Central venous access devices (CVADs) can facilitate repeated and/or urgent administration of coagulation factors in haemophilic patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of complication rates and risk factors for poor outcome. Forty-eight studies with a total of 2704 patients and 2973 CVADs were included. The primary indications for CVADs were immune tolerance therapy (34.9% of patients), difficult venous access (31.8%) and prophylaxis (29.1%). Fully implanted CVADs were employed in 77.4% of cases and external CVADs in 22.6%. A total of 1190 infections were reported, and the pooled incidence of infection was 0.66 per 1000 CVAD days [confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.97 per 1000 CVAD days]. Among patients developing infection, the pooled time to first infection was 295 days (CI, 181-479 days). Presence of inhibitors was an independent risk factor for infection with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.67 (CI, 1.15-2.43). Infection was less likely in patients >6 years of age (IRR, 0.46; CI, 0.27-0.79) and recipients of fully implanted CVADs (IRR, 0.31; CI, 0.12-0.86). Available information on thrombosis was limited, with only 55 cases being reported. Eventually, 31.3% of CVADs were removed, and infection was the reason for removal in 69.9% of cases and thrombosis in 4.1%. The pooled time period CVADs remained indwelling prior to removal or the expiration of the study observation period was 578 days per CVAD (CI, 456-733 days per CVAD). CVADs can confer major benefits in patients with haemophilia requiring long-term venous access, and serious complications are rare.

“…Despite the clinical burden, studies on the specific impact that haemophilia B has on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are scarce. Published studies evaluating HRQoL in haemophilia have generally tended to include few (6-15%) patients with haemophilia B, if any [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. One US study, Hemophilia Utilization Group Study Part Vb, reported that haemophilia B patients experience burden on the physical aspect of HRQoL [12,13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improvement in health‐related quality of life with recombinant factor IX prophylaxis in severe or moderately severe haemophilia B patients: results from the BAX326 Pivotal Study

Windyga

Lin

et al. 2013

Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden of haemophilia B. The aim of this study was to assess HRQoL burden of haemophilia B, the benefit of recombinant factor IX (rFIX) prophylaxis and the HRQoL benefit of achieving a zero annual bleed rate. Subjects receiving rFIX (BAX326) prophylaxis or on-demand completed the SF-36 survey. Baseline SF-36 scores were compared to the general US population scores to understand the HRQoL burden. Changes in SF-36 scores between baseline and follow-up were tested using t-tests. Subgroup analysis was conducted to examine SF-36 change among subjects who switched to BAX326 prophylaxis. SF-36 scores were also compared between those with zero bleeds and those who bled during the study. Compared to the US norms, subjects reported lower average scores in all physical and several mental HRQoL domains. At follow-up, prophylaxis subjects reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in overall physical HRQoL, as measured by the Physical Component Score (PCS) (mean change 2.60, P = 0.019), Bodily Pain (BP) (3.45, P = 0.015) and Role Physical (RP) domains (3.47, P = 0.016). Subjects who switched to prophylaxis from intermittent prophylaxis or on-demand experienced more pronounced improvements not only in the PCS (3.21, P = 0.014), BP (3.71, P = 0.026), RP (4.43, P = 0.008) but also in Vitality (3.71, P = 0.04), Social Functioning (5.06, P = 0.002) and General Health domains (3.40, P = 0.009). Subjects achieving zero bleeds reported lower BP (P = 0.038). Prophylaxis with BAX326 significantly improved HRQoL in patients with moderately severe or severe haemophilia B by reducing bleeds.