Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-585-36947-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haemodialysers and Associated Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread use of polysulfone membranes for high-flux hemodialysis has increased in recent years [22,23]. Here two synthetic polysulfone membranes were investigated in a comparative analysis regarding their convective and diffusive performance characteristics during chronic high-flux hemodialysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use of polysulfone membranes for high-flux hemodialysis has increased in recent years [22,23]. Here two synthetic polysulfone membranes were investigated in a comparative analysis regarding their convective and diffusive performance characteristics during chronic high-flux hemodialysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oncotic pressure, which is exerted by the plasma proteins and opposes the hydrostatic transmembrane pressure, is implemented as a discontinuous local pressure drop at the skin-bulk interface. Because of the difficulty to induce in vitro a stable protein layer on the membrane [10], initial oncotic pressure from literature (25mmHg) was used [13,14]. Moreover, as hemoconcentration takes place in axial direction, the oncotic pressure is varying with hematocrit.…”
Section: Model Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a constant blood and dialysate inlet flow of 250 and 500mL/min, respectively, blood and dialysate outlet pressures of 10kPa (75mmHg) and 5Pa (0.04mmHg), respectively, and an initial oncotic pressure of 3.33kPa (25mmHg) [13,14], the pressure distribution renders an overall ultrafiltration flow of 45mL/min while no backfiltration occurs. As blood, with an initial viscosity of 3mPa.s, flows through the dialyzer, the water removal causes hemoconcentration.…”
Section: Microscopic Flow and Mass Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pre-and post-dialyzer pressure difference (¢P) is proportional to 1/n (where n = number of fibers in the dialyzer) according to the formula ¢P = 8 * Q B * Ë * L/n *  * r4 (where Q B = blood flow, Ë = viscosity, L = length of the dialyzer, r = radius of the dialyzer fiber) [4][5][6] and A (effective surface area of the dialyzer) is proportional to J (solute transport) according to the formula A = J/Ko * ¢C (where Ko = mass transfer coefficient and ¢C = difference in the solute concentration between the two sides of the membrane) [7], a progressive clotting of the fibers of the dialyzer will generate, probably with a similar kinetic, an increase in ¢P and a decrease in solute transport. A direct correlation between urea clearance and residual fiber bundle volume (a 10% decrease in the first is generated by a 20% loss in the second) was identified in a previous in vitro study [2].…”
Section: Methods and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%