Haematology, physiological parameters, morphometry and parasitological status of rescued bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus)

Abstract

Background There are few studies on the physiology and haematology of rescued bearded capuchin monkeys. These are necessary to better understand the health and welfare status of the animals, including when performing reintroductions, and to avoid zoonoses. Methods We aimed to obtain physiological and haematological values, morphometry and parasitological status of 26 bearded capuchins in two rescue centres in Northeast Brazil. Results We found sex‐ and age‐related differences in respiratory rate, body weight and body mass index, but not haematology. The haematological values obtained were significantly different from published data but within the reference intervals for the species. Animals infected with Ancylostoma spp. had significantly lower values in the parameters: haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration than non‐infected individuals. Conclusion Physiological and haematological values of rescued capuchins were similar to those found in previous studies. Ancylostomiasis appears to cause alterations to haematological values of this species.

Apparent digestibility and nutritional status of capuchin monkeys (Sapajus sp.) under human care

“…The inclusion criteria for the digestibility test included normality of the physical examination, encompassing parameters such as heart and respiratory rate, coloration of the mucous membranes, lymph nodes, hydration, cardiorespiratory auscultation, palpation, and body temperature, as well as blood count within the reference range for the species 16,17 …”

“…The inclusion criteria for the digestibility test included normality of the physical examination, encompassing parameters such as heart and respiratory rate, coloration of the mucous membranes, lymph nodes, hydration, cardiorespiratory auscultation, palpation, and body temperature, as well as blood count within the reference range for the species. 16,17 The exclusion criteria included animals that were severely weakened, exhibited signs of disease, or showed any other abnormalities during screening examinations. The animals were dewormed prior to the start of the digestibility study.…”