2014
DOI: 10.7601/mez.65.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haemaphysalis japonica, Haemaphysalis jezoensis and ^|^#8220;Haemaphysalis douglasi^|^#8221; (Acari: Ixodidae): Which tick is distributed in Hokkaido?

Abstract: As a general view, the ixodid tick Haemaphysalis japonica is distributed in Japan (Kyushu, Honshu and Hokkaido islands) and in a continental area including Russia Primorsky Krai, eastern China and the Korean Peninsula. The continental population is treated as a subspecies, Haemaphysalis japonica douglasi. The Hokkaido population was once named Haemaphysalis jezoensis, but synonymized with H. japonica. An irregular taxonomic revision, however, elevated H. japonica douglasi to specific rank for the continental a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research stands out as we employed whole mitogenomes of multiple individuals from each tick species to investigate the genetic diversity on a regional scale in Japan. In contrast to earlier studies that struggled to molecularly differentiate H. japonica and H. megaspinosa or classify H. japonica subspecies in the country 13 , 20 , we successfully analyzed the nucleotide variations in the complete mitogenomes between H. japonica and H. megaspinosa . Additionally, we examined the intraspecies genetic relationships and population differentiation among H. japonica subspecies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our research stands out as we employed whole mitogenomes of multiple individuals from each tick species to investigate the genetic diversity on a regional scale in Japan. In contrast to earlier studies that struggled to molecularly differentiate H. japonica and H. megaspinosa or classify H. japonica subspecies in the country 13 , 20 , we successfully analyzed the nucleotide variations in the complete mitogenomes between H. japonica and H. megaspinosa . Additionally, we examined the intraspecies genetic relationships and population differentiation among H. japonica subspecies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, H. jezoensis was suggested to be morphologically identical to H. japonica douglasi from China and Russia and collectively named as Haemaphysalis douglasi without taxonomic descriptions 19 . Most recently, H. douglasi from Hokkaido and H. japonica from Honshu Islands were suggested to be the same species based on comparing the partial sequences of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…longicornis and Ha. hystricis belong to the same group of Kaiseriana subgenus [39,40]. Within the rst phylogroup based on the 12S rRNA gene, the Chongming longicornis ticks identi ed in this study were closely related to those from Hebei Province (MK439888) and Guangdong Province (MW642389).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In Japan, at least 43 hard tick species are recorded so far (Fujita and Takada, 2007;Nakao and Ito, 2014;Yamaguti et al, 1971;Yamauchi and Takada, 2015). Among them, successful establishment and maintenance have been previously reported for the following species (Levin and Schumacher, 2016): A. testudinarium Koch, 1844, H. campanulata Warburton, 1908, H. concinna Koch, 1844, H. cornigera Neumann, 1897, H. ava Neumann, 1897, H. formosensis Neumann, 1913, H. hystricis Supino, 1897, H. kitaokai Hoogstraal, 1969, H. longicornis, H. mageshimaensis Saito & Hoogstraal, 1973, H. pentalagi Pospelova-Shtrom, 1935, H. yeni Toumanoff, 1944 microplus, R. sanguineus (Fujisaki et al, 1976), H. megaspinosa Saito, 1969(Fujisaki et al, 1976Saito, 1969), I. persulcatus (Fujimoto, 1993;Fujisaki et al, 1976;Konnai et al, 2008) and I. ovatus Neumann, 1899 (Fujimoto, 1989(Fujimoto, , 1990(Fujimoto, , 1994Fujisaki et al, 1976).…”
Section: Importance Of Laboratory Colonies Of Ticks As Research Resoumentioning
confidence: 99%