2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.132002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD

Abstract: We report the first result for the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment with all errors systematically controlled. Several ensembles using 2+1 flavors of physical mass Möbius domain-wall fermions, generated by the RBC/UKQCD collaborations, are employed to take the continuum and infinite volume limits of finite volume lattice QED+QCD. We find a HLbL µ = 7.20(3.98)stat(1.65)sys × 10 −10 . Our value is consistent with previous model results and leaves little room f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
190
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(75 reference statements)
15
190
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With recent advances in constraining the contribution from hadronic light-by-light scattering (including evaluations [33][34][35]37,38,[55][56][57] based on dispersion relations in analogy to Eq. (1), short-distance constraints [39][40][41], and lattice QCD [36,42]) as well as higher-order hadronic corrections [30,31,43,58], this data-driven determination of HVP has corroborated the ðg − 2Þ μ tension at the level of 3.7σ. Nevertheless, since by far the largest hadronic correction arises from HVP, requirements for the relative precision are extraordinary, with a HVP μ ¼ 693.1ð4.0Þ × 10 −10 [20, [25][26][27][28][29][30] as currently determined from e þ e − → hadrons cross sections corresponding to less than 0.6%.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…With recent advances in constraining the contribution from hadronic light-by-light scattering (including evaluations [33][34][35]37,38,[55][56][57] based on dispersion relations in analogy to Eq. (1), short-distance constraints [39][40][41], and lattice QCD [36,42]) as well as higher-order hadronic corrections [30,31,43,58], this data-driven determination of HVP has corroborated the ðg − 2Þ μ tension at the level of 3.7σ. Nevertheless, since by far the largest hadronic correction arises from HVP, requirements for the relative precision are extraordinary, with a HVP μ ¼ 693.1ð4.0Þ × 10 −10 [20, [25][26][27][28][29][30] as currently determined from e þ e − → hadrons cross sections corresponding to less than 0.6%.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The simplified connection to model estimates enables our work to provide a valuable cross-check for the predictions of hadronic models and dispersive methods; this work is thereby complementary to lattice calculations directly aiming at a hlbl μ for physical quark masses [16]. At the same time, this study allows us to learn about the size of various sources of systematic error, particularly the finite-size effects, and how well we are able to correct for them semi-analytically.…”
Section: (): V-volmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the HLbL contribution, new analytic approaches [39][40][41][42][43] as well as the first ab-initio lattice QCD calculation [32] building on multi-year methodology development [44][45][46][47][48][49] so far show consistent results and rule out the HLbL contribution as an explanation for the current * christoph.lehner@ur.de † ameyer@quark.phy.bnl.gov tension between theory and experiment. For the HVP contribution, however, tensions exist within lattice QCD calculations [50] as well as between lattice QCD calculations and R-ratio results [27,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the near future, we also look forward to results from the methodologically independent experimental program at J-PARC [5]. These results are highly anticipated and are accompanied by a concerted effort of the theory community to improve upon and scrutinize the existing standard model results, most importantly for the hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) [1, and hadronic light-by-light (HLbL) [31,32] contributions, which currently limit the precision of the theory result. The Muon g − 2 Theory Initiative, a multi-year community effort [33][34][35][36][37], is now in the final stages of writing a whitepaper summarizing the current theory status [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%