2012
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/7/09/p09017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadronic energy resolution of a highly granular scintillator-steel hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques

Abstract: The energy resolution of a highly granular 1 m 3 analogue scintillator-steel hadronic calorimeter is studied using charged pions with energies from 10 GeV to 80 GeV at the CERN SPS. The energy resolution for single hadrons is determined to be approximately 58%/ E/GeV. This resolution is improved to approximately 45%/ E/GeV with software compensation techniques. These techniques take advantage of the event-by-event information about the substructure of hadronic showers which is provided by the imaging capabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linearity and the energy resolution -a key performance parameter even for a particle flow detector -of the AHCAL have been studied using pion beam at di erent energies [315]. In Figure III- 3.18(left) the reconstructed single particle energy is shown as a function of the beam energy.…”
Section: Ahcal Test Beam Results and Operational Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linearity and the energy resolution -a key performance parameter even for a particle flow detector -of the AHCAL have been studied using pion beam at di erent energies [315]. In Figure III- 3.18(left) the reconstructed single particle energy is shown as a function of the beam energy.…”
Section: Ahcal Test Beam Results and Operational Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hadronic response for the AHCAL shows small deviations from linearity (less than 2% up to 80 GeV), mainly due to the non-compensating features of the structure (e/fi ≥ 1.19) [315] and to leakage. It can be predicted by simulations and was verified with test beam data.…”
Section: Energy Scalesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This saturation effect is addressed by the cellby-cell application of a correction algorithm which gives the expected true number of photons for a given number of fired SiPM pixels, as discussed in detail in [8], resulting in the recovery of a linear response of the calorimeter over a wide energy range. While the uncertainty of this saturation correction is the leading systematic in the energy reconstruction for electromagnetic showers of 40 GeV and above [8], it was found to be negligible for hadronic showers at all energies [9]. With local software compensation techniques used for energy reconstruction, the prototype achieved a hadronic energy resolution of ∼ 44%/ √ E[GeV] ⊕ 1.8% [9], with a response within 1.5% of linearity.…”
Section: Pioneering Experiments: Calice and T2kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the uncertainty of this saturation correction is the leading systematic in the energy reconstruction for electromagnetic showers of 40 GeV and above [8], it was found to be negligible for hadronic showers at all energies [9]. With local software compensation techniques used for energy reconstruction, the prototype achieved a hadronic energy resolution of ∼ 44%/ √ E[GeV] ⊕ 1.8% [9], with a response within 1.5% of linearity. Following the successful tests of the CALICE AHCAL physics prototype, the technology for highly granular scintillator-based calorimeters was further developed, as discussed in Section 3.3.…”
Section: Pioneering Experiments: Calice and T2kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the AHCAL validated procedures for channel calibration and monitoring that account for the non-linear and T-dependent response of SiPMs. Also, it demonstrated powerful compensation techniques based on the energy density to reduce the shower stochastic fluctuations from 58%/ √ E to 45%/ √ E [14] while keeping a constant term smaller than 2 % (Fig. 2 left).…”
Section: Hadronic Calorimetersmentioning
confidence: 99%