2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.85.014029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadronic contribution to the muong2factor: A theoretical determination

Abstract: The leading order hadronic contribution to the muon g-2, a HAD µ , is determined entirely from theory using an approach based on Cauchy's theorem in the complex squared energy s-plane. This is possible after fitting the integration kernel in a HAD µ with a simpler function of s. The integral determining a HAD µ in the light-quark region is then split into a low energy and a high energy part, the latter given by perturbative QCD (PQCD). The low energy integral involving the fit function to the integration kerne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] and the value m b = (4.171±0.009) GeV by Ref. [30]. For completeness, with our m b result (6.2) Eq.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…[7] and the value m b = (4.171±0.009) GeV by Ref. [30]. For completeness, with our m b result (6.2) Eq.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Chetyrkin et al [37], HPQCD14 [38], and Dehnadi et al [39] use N 3 LO low n moments equated to the corresponding experimental moments evaluated using the available experimental information (masses and decays) supplemented with lattice information and/or assuming perturbation theory at high energies. Finite energy [40] or Laplace [41] sum rules have also been applied for low n. Penin et al [42] and Beneke et al [43,44] uses nonrelativistic (with Coulomb resummation) N 3 LO large n moments (the first reference uses a partial result). Pineda et al [45] and Hoang et al [46] use NNLO and (a partial) NNLL expression for nonrelativistic (with Coulomb resummation) large n moments.…”
Section: Determination Of M Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reason is that the charm quark contribution computed in perturbation theory [6] is a hvp µ,c = 1.44(1)×10 −9 . Hence, the charm quark contribution has approximately the same size as the light-by-light contribution [7] and the electroweak contributions [3] which are larger than the current experimental and theoretical uncertainties.…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)099mentioning
confidence: 99%