2009
DOI: 10.1142/s021827180901559x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadron-Initiated Emission Processes in Blazar Jets

Abstract: Despite many advances in AGN physics, observationally as well as theoretically, the relativistic matter composition of extragalactic jets remains concealed. In contrast to the so called leptonic AGN emission models, hadronic models consider relativistic protons to be present in those sources, in addition to the relativistic electrons and positrons, and possibly cold material. Here I briefly discuss most processes that are commonly believed to characterize the so-called hadronic AGN emission models, and these i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, a compilation of fluxes expected from AGN flares are shown. Flux-1 and Flux-2 are calculations for Feb 23, 2006 γ-ray flare of 3C 279 [27]. Flux-3 and Flux-4 represent predictions for PKS 2155-304 in low-state and high-state, respectively [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, a compilation of fluxes expected from AGN flares are shown. Flux-1 and Flux-2 are calculations for Feb 23, 2006 γ-ray flare of 3C 279 [27]. Flux-3 and Flux-4 represent predictions for PKS 2155-304 in low-state and high-state, respectively [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total observable rates (number of expected log (E/GeV) [27]. Flux-3 and Flux-4 represent predictions for PKS 2155-304 [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the blazar 3C279, we considered the possibility of variable emission, motivated by the reports on a gamma-ray flare by MAGIC [19]. Since hadronic acceleration models seem to be favored for this event [20], we performed a time dependent test of neutrino fluxes predicted in [21]. The most promising periods for flares during the livetime for the analysis were selected based on X-ray and optical observations from [22], requiring enhanced emission in both wavebands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No events were found during the selected periods. We derived a limit on the neutrino fluence of 3.7 × 10 −3 erg cm −2 in the energy range 8.3 × 10 5 to 7.6 × 10 7 GeV, based on the model spectrum from [21] shown in Fig. 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see in the plot the height cut leads also to a smaller (about factor two) acceptance. [17]. Flux-3 and Flux-4 represent predictions for PKS 2155-304 [18].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Estimate Of Magic Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%