2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(01)01377-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadron freeze-out conditions in high energy nuclear collisions

Abstract: Systematic trend of the hadron freeze-out conditions from AGS/SPS to RHIC is discussed. The most interesting results from collisions at RHIC are that the system is indeed approaching net-baryon free and the transverse expansion is much stronger than that from collisions at AGS/SPS energies. In order to understand the trend of the collective velocity, an energy scan between $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 20 - 200 GeV, is important. In addition, systematic studies on the anisotropy parameter $v_2$ and the transverse momentum … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in contradiction with the result presented in [22] that the collective flow is stronger at RHIC. It can, however, be seen in [22] that this is strongly influenced by the proton and antiproton spectra from STAR used in the analysis, which show a much larger inverse slope than the PHENIX results. From the SPS data it is clear that a Gaussian-like profile, which leads to an overprediction of the pion yield at high m T , is excluded.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in contradiction with the result presented in [22] that the collective flow is stronger at RHIC. It can, however, be seen in [22] that this is strongly influenced by the proton and antiproton spectra from STAR used in the analysis, which show a much larger inverse slope than the PHENIX results. From the SPS data it is clear that a Gaussian-like profile, which leads to an overprediction of the pion yield at high m T , is excluded.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a very large flow velocity of β T ≈ 0.55 as in [5] and [8], a temperature of T kin ≈ 90 MeV would be required, in line with the results of [8], but contradicting the values quoted in [5], however, no good fit can be obtained. The present results for the best fit appear to agree with the values given in [22], which are also derived from SPS data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…72). Blast-wave fits to spectra (183) indicate that freeze-out flow and temperature vary significantly with √ s NN for √ s NN 10 GeV. The overall approximate √ s NN -independence of the α i parameters may reflect the fact that significantly changing the slope of R i (m T ) requires very large changes in flow and temperature; on the other hand, it could be that the compensating effects of smaller (larger) homogeneity lengths generated by larger flow (temperature) cancel almost exactly in nature.…”
Section: K T Dependence Of Pion Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle yield ratios are used to extract chemical freezeout parameters using local equilibrium models [ 9,10]. The chemical freeze-out temperature (T ch ) is independent of centrality and collision energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%