2005
DOI: 10.1007/11523468_94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadamard Tensors and Lower Bounds on Multiparty Communication Complexity

Abstract: Abstract. We develop a new method for estimating the discrepancy of tensors associated with multiparty communication problems in the "Number on the Forehead" model of Chandra, Furst and Lipton. We define an analogue of the Hadamard property of matrices for tensors in multiple dimensions and show that any k-party communication problem represented by a Hadamard tensor must have Ω(n/2 k ) multiparty communication complexity. We also exhibit constructions of Hadamard tensors, giving Ω(n/2 k ) lower bounds on multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of Prop. 1 consists in the fact that matrices M having maximal excess have been exhaustively studied by mathematicians during the last five decades, including a wide range of Hadamard matrices [28,[32][33][34][35][36]43], complex Hadamard matrices [44], Hadamard tensors [45] and orthogonal designs [46]. These results considerably extend the set of Bell inequalities for which the LHV value is known [25], which is not a minor observation taking into account the hardness to calculate the LHV value of a bipartite Bell inequality [47].…”
Section: Excess and Lhv Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of Prop. 1 consists in the fact that matrices M having maximal excess have been exhaustively studied by mathematicians during the last five decades, including a wide range of Hadamard matrices [28,[32][33][34][35][36]43], complex Hadamard matrices [44], Hadamard tensors [45] and orthogonal designs [46]. These results considerably extend the set of Bell inequalities for which the LHV value is known [25], which is not a minor observation taking into account the hardness to calculate the LHV value of a bipartite Bell inequality [47].…”
Section: Excess and Lhv Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this lemma implies hardness in the almost adaptive one-round SM model (since this model is more restrictive), and hence, together with Theorems 2 and 3, implies security of the Γ pos ,D,t and Γ ka ,D,t protocols. The communication complexity of the GIP function has been studied in multiple papers [5,6,32,23,22], but up to our knowledge, not in the strong randomized settings that we need in this work. Our proof is a rather straightforward adaptation of the techniques from this prior work.…”
Section: Protocols In the Plain Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 2.2 (Ford & Gál 2005;Raz 2000). Let M ∈ {−1, 1} |X|×|Y | , and let μ be a probability distribution over X ×Y.…”
Section: Discrepancy Under Product Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ford and Gál used Lemma 2.2 in an elegant way to relate discrepancy to the pairwise correlations of the matrix rows: Lemma 2.3 (Ford & Gál 2005). For every Boolean function f (x, y) and every…”
Section: Discrepancy Under Product Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation