2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64343-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadamard States from Light-like Hypersurfaces

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having defined Hadamard states, we must ask whether (a) such states exist, at least on globally hyperbolic spacetimes, and (b) how to construct/characterize concretely Hadamard states on given spacetime representing given physical setups. (a) has been established by several rigorous methods, see [59,60,61,62,63]. In particular, given any one Hadamard state Ψ, we may go to a representation of the field algebra by operators on a Hilbert space, in which the state is represented by a vector.…”
Section: Hadamard States From Null Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having defined Hadamard states, we must ask whether (a) such states exist, at least on globally hyperbolic spacetimes, and (b) how to construct/characterize concretely Hadamard states on given spacetime representing given physical setups. (a) has been established by several rigorous methods, see [59,60,61,62,63]. In particular, given any one Hadamard state Ψ, we may go to a representation of the field algebra by operators on a Hilbert space, in which the state is represented by a vector.…”
Section: Hadamard States From Null Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11] constitute examples of divergence-free null hypersurfaces. One might therefore speculate that the simplicity of the representation formula in both cases will be a key ingredient in completely explaining the tantalising similarity between, on the one hand, the universal expressions derived in [KW91] for the two-point functions of isometry-invariant Hadamard states evaluated on pairs of solutions both in S A or in S B and, on the other hand, the expression of the two-point function of the distinguished state on future/past null infinity described in [DMP17] and in references therein. This ought to be further investigated.…”
Section: Final Remarks and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(iv) The factor 2 in the definition of the scaling transformations u λ has been introduced to match with the convention for 2-point functions on lightlike hyperplanes used in the literature, see e.g. [15]. See also the remark towards the end of Sect.…”
Section: Remark (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is common in the operator algebraic approach to algebraic quantum field theory (cf. [24] and in the present context, see also [15,22,37,57]) one can introduce a family {W(G)} of C * algebras indexed by open, relatively compact subsets G of R × S * by defining W(G) as the C * -subalgebra generated by all W (ϕ) with supp(ϕ) ⊂ G.…”
Section: The Scaling Limit Theory On T * (And Its Extension)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation