2006
DOI: 10.1002/evan.20096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Had Reverend Jenyns said yes: A small decision with a big impact on biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wallace became a spiritualist, suggesting that humans had an innate moral sense of right and wrong . He had a more group‐oriented view than Darwin did and was a socialist who worked for the ethic of a more equitable, and hence, cooperative society. Unlike Darwin, his ethics were derived at least in part by excepting humans from the pure competitive biological process of evolution.…”
Section: The Issues Recycle On All Sides Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wallace became a spiritualist, suggesting that humans had an innate moral sense of right and wrong . He had a more group‐oriented view than Darwin did and was a socialist who worked for the ethic of a more equitable, and hence, cooperative society. Unlike Darwin, his ethics were derived at least in part by excepting humans from the pure competitive biological process of evolution.…”
Section: The Issues Recycle On All Sides Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alfred Russel Wallace discovered evolution independently at about the same time as Darwin did, but he reacted quite differently. 2 He did not think that natural selection could have produced human traits like mathematical and musical abilities. After all, hunter-gatherers didn't compose piano sonatas or work out differential equations.…”
Section: The Issues Recycle On All Sides Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, Darwinian principles have been reviewed from accepting or skeptical points of view in various ways . But even with the assumption that selection is the pervasive force, there is the ever‐cycling debate about whether group rather than individual‐based selection is important or, indeed, even exists . In any case, the various reservations are often if not typically elided, perhaps because they discomfit tidy “Darwinian” explanation.…”
Section: Some Key Points In Darwinmentioning
confidence: 99%