2011
DOI: 10.3791/3446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habituation and Prepulse Inhibition of Acoustic Startle in Rodents

Abstract: The acoustic startle response is a protective response, elicited by a sudden and intense acoustic stimulus. Facial and skeletal muscles are activated within a few milliseconds, leading to a whole body flinch in rodents 1 . Although startle responses are reflexive responses that can be reliably elicited, they are not stereotypic. They can be modulated by emotions such as fear (fear potentiated startle) and joy (joy attenuated startle), by non-associative learning processes such as habituation and sensitization,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Averages are calculated for each IRT. None of the drugs used, changed the latency of premature responses at any IRT (unpaired Student's t-test) activation of a startle response, which is evoked by 10 dB louder stimuli (Floody and Kilgard 2007;Dagnino-Subiabre et al 2009), while 80-85-dB sounds as used in our experiment evokes a non-startle response (Valsamis and Schmid 2011). The dependence on NT dose is described by a Yerkes-Dodson inverted Ushaped relationship, consistent with a performance correlating with the phasic release of NE.…”
Section: Inverse U-shaped Dependence Of Performance On Ntmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Averages are calculated for each IRT. None of the drugs used, changed the latency of premature responses at any IRT (unpaired Student's t-test) activation of a startle response, which is evoked by 10 dB louder stimuli (Floody and Kilgard 2007;Dagnino-Subiabre et al 2009), while 80-85-dB sounds as used in our experiment evokes a non-startle response (Valsamis and Schmid 2011). The dependence on NT dose is described by a Yerkes-Dodson inverted Ushaped relationship, consistent with a performance correlating with the phasic release of NE.…”
Section: Inverse U-shaped Dependence Of Performance On Ntmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Also of note were differences in expression of genes in the dopamine pathway (Fig. S2) because perturbation of the dopamine system impairs novel object recognition and PPI in rodents (37,38), as do alterations in the pathway of EIF2 because this factor is central to the control of long-term synaptic plasticity and memory storage (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavioural testing paradigm consisted of the following phases: the acclimation phase, a habituation phase (block 1), and PPI measurement (block 2, see also Valsamis and Schmid, 2011). During the acclimation phase animals were exposed to the chambers and white background noise (65 dB) for 3 min.…”
Section: Behavioural Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%