2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitual Use of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Female Speakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
89
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
89
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If low subglottal pressure is a necessary condition for creak, then it is not surprising that it frequently occurs in phrase/utterance/turn-final position, where the speaker will have less air available than at the start of the utterance. Creak has also recently received attention from popular science articles following the study in Wolk and Abdelli-Beruh (2012) which demonstrated that two thirds of the young female American English speakers analysed displayed creak at the end of read sentences. The authors state that continuous use of creak is likely to be more prevalent in more sociable, conversational speech settings (however this was not formally investigated).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If low subglottal pressure is a necessary condition for creak, then it is not surprising that it frequently occurs in phrase/utterance/turn-final position, where the speaker will have less air available than at the start of the utterance. Creak has also recently received attention from popular science articles following the study in Wolk and Abdelli-Beruh (2012) which demonstrated that two thirds of the young female American English speakers analysed displayed creak at the end of read sentences. The authors state that continuous use of creak is likely to be more prevalent in more sociable, conversational speech settings (however this was not formally investigated).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, as creak is known to be frequently produced during hesitations (Carlson et al, 2006) its detection could also be used to identify hesitations which could, in turn, be used for distinguishing speaking styles or, for instance, providing feedback on presentation skills. The robust automatic detection of creak would be beneficial for sociological studies (e.g., Wolk and Abdelli-Beruh, 2012) and studies on tonal patterns (Yu and Lam, 2011) in terms of allowing quantitative analysis on larger volumes of data. Furthermore, as studies have shown listeners to be sensitive to creak in terms of recognition of the speaker's identity (Böhm and Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2007), the detection of creak can be exploited for improving speaker recognition systems Elliot, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may support a cultural-based explanation of an absence of vocal fry when the same subjects spoke in Hebrew compared to the appearance of vocal fry when speaking in English. The change in vocal parameters in this instance may signify a kind of vocal code switching when bilingual Hebrew/English speakers speak in English compared to Hebrew, given that recent studies have indicated vocal fry as a culturally-accepted vocal norm in Standard American English (28,29) . A final significant perceptual finding was an increase in the perceptual assessment of throaty resonance in Hebrew amongst the total population and in females when compared to a more adequate resonance in English during spontaneous speech.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Vocal fry, or "creaky voice", refers to a distinct low vibratory pattern produced at the vocal folds. Recent research has identified vocal fry as a current vocal trend in American English, particularly amongst female speakers, but also in males, that is not necessarily attributed as pathological voice behavior (28,29) . This may support a cultural-based explanation of an absence of vocal fry when the same subjects spoke in Hebrew compared to the appearance of vocal fry when speaking in English.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation