Habitual Generation of Filter Bubbles: Why is Algorithmic Personalisation Problematic for the Democratic Public Sphere?

Abstract

In the last decade, digital filter bubbles have become widely discussed phenomena in different fields within the broader discipline of media and communication studies. This paper focuses on the question of why they are problematic for the functioning of the public sphere. This paper argues that algorithmic personalisation can lead to the fragmentation, polarisation, and radicalisation of the public sphere because of the complex relationship between human agency and technology that mutually encourage one another through habitual adaptation. Through the concept of habit, such theoretical grounding enables a critique of existing empirical research regarding the filter bubble effect, with the argument that the main problem is not information isolation or the reduced accessibility/visibility of selected content, but the habitual adaptation of content to individual users, which can explain why users stick to certain content. The article concludes with the finding that the problem of algorithmic personalisation should be studied as a broader historic phenomenon indicative of the decline of the public sphere, which is itself caused by the conflict between public and commercial interests.

Online Collaborative Documents as Media Logic: The Mediatization of Risk Response in the Post-pandemic Era

“…The form of social practice supported by OCDs appeared superficially to be a form of public deliberation, which pointed initially to a discussion of publicness. Academic debate is growing about whether digital media constitute a new public sphere (see Kaluža, 2022;Mpofu et al, 2022), and this study provides a case in a risk context. We attempted to claim that shaping the affective publics was one of the sustainability implications of OCDs.…”

Upodatkovanje javnosti in mnenjske tehnologije

“…To ne zahteva le sprememb v zasnovi priporočilnih algoritmov, temveč tudi spremembe v »družbenem okolju«, v katero so algoritmi vpeti. Priporočilni algoritmi pogosto veljajo za glavni ali celo edini razlog, da se uporabniki interneta poslužujejo praks sprejemanja in deljenja mnenj (na primer retvitov) iz navade, vendar lahko v resnici enake oblike vedenja zasledimo tudi v povsem »demokratičnih« okoliščinah, ki uporabnikom bistveno ne omejujejo dostopa do alternativnih vsebin (Kaluža 2021). V Tönniesovi idealnotipski shematični delitvi na Gemeinschaft in Gesellschaft je osebna navada oziroma tradicija elementarna, običaj pa kompleksna oblika organske volje, konstitutivna za Gemainschaft (v nasprotju z vedenjem, ki ga v Gesellschaft vodijo norme in zakonodaja).…”

Ética y moralidad en los medios de comunicación: investigaciones y propuestas

“…Otro ángulo de debate es el reconocimiento de los bots de deep fakes de IA que desde otros referentes territoriales -si es que podemos hablar de eso en el entorno de la nube -, hay claros indicios de manipulaciones en los procesos de búsqueda, de todos los motores de búsqueda que utilizamos día a día en situarnos en "filtro de burbuja 53 " que rodea a cada ciudadano y que son autogeneradas por nuestra identidad digital que conformamos con nuestro actuar en la red. (Kaluža, 2021;Rhodes, 2022;Zuiderveen Borgesius et al, 2016) Por otra parte, la IA es una forma de sesgar las agendas informativas y con ello al histórico debate editorial que ha tenido este momento diario del ejercicio periodístico. En sentido general el informe de (Beckett, 2019) deja abierta la reflexión entre una ética humana y una ética basada en IA.…”