Habiter en Ehpad au temps de la Covid-19

Balard, Frédéric; Caradec, Vincent; Castra, Michel; Chassagne, Aline; Clavandier, Gaëlle; Launay, Pauline; Schrecker, Cherry; Trimaille, Hélène

doi:10.3917/rpsf.141.0031

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, it has been suggested that decision-making processes related to housing need to be reconsidered, taking into account the pandemic's impact (Haghighi, 2021). Research conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns has revealed that the pandemic has adversely affected the lives of older adults in EPHAD 4 and mothers overwhelmed with housework (Balard et al, 2021;Lambert et al, 2021). Furthermore, individuals who previously had limited socialisation opportunities, such as those living in EPHAD or mental health institutions, have experienced increased con nement due to the pandemic, exacerbating existing problems (Messy, 2020;Sordes et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping Strategies of the Inhabitants of Collaborative and Regular Housing Arrangements during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Emerging Conceptual Re-elaboration of the Underlying Mechanisms through an Integrative Literature Review

Khatibi,

Höpler,

Aksumer

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review revisits the literature on collaborative and regular housing focusing on the intersection of housing affordability, social integration and health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Collaborative housing is an umbrella term that generates space not only for socio-spatial alternatives but also for alternative economic and legal frameworks in the context of housing. Hence, collaborative housing broadens the scope of regular housing by enabling the appropriation of common spaces by the inhabitants, encouraging social interaction, promoting sharing practices, self-organisation and collective solidarity in everyday life. Little is known about the challenges, experiences and mechanisms underlying the coping ways by which inhabitants dealt with the COVID-19 pandemic. Through an integrative literature review methodology, this study explores (1) How was unwanted isolation experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic?, (2) How did residents cope with the pandemic?, and (3) Which spatial solutions contributed to their well-being? This review includes 50 peer-reviewed articles, ten reports and 12 grey literature publications in three linguistic areas of English, German, and French in the timeframe of 2020–2022. Enriching the COVID-19 research in the context of housing, the review contributes to the synthesis of a state-of-the-art knowledge space by representing an emerged conceptual re-elaboration of coping responses in the context of regular and collaborative housing settings. Thus, the essence of this integrative review approach catalysed the unearthing of the underlying mechanisms of coping strategies and their causal explanations. Insights from various perspectives are extracted and organised to make them accessible to all while the elaboration for future research is identified.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping Strategies of the Inhabitants of Collaborative and Regular Housing Arrangements during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Emerging Conceptual Re-elaboration of the Underlying Mechanisms through an Integrative Literature Review

Khatibi,

Höpler,

Aksumer

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Penser en temps de pandémie : l’expérience du deuil en EHPAD, entre rupture et continuité

Berre

2022

Médecine Palliative

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The limits of social investment and the resilience of long-term care

Hooren

Ledoux

2023

European Journal of Social Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article investigates the extent to which a social investment paradigm has guided policy reforms in long-term care for the elderly in France and the Netherlands and how this relates to the resilience of the sector during the Covid-19 pandemic. It conceptualizes the theoretical impact of social investment on long-term care policy and analyzes its use to justify reforms since the early 2000s. It concludes that social investment has not played any role in Dutch long-term care reforms and a moderate role in France. Meanwhile, in both countries a neoliberal emphasis on the efficiency of the market has contributed to a rise in for-profit service provision and fragmentation of the long-term care sector. While long-term care provision in both countries proved relatively resilient in the first phase of the pandemic, at a later stage its resilience was undermined by fragmentation and marketization, limiting the government's ability to respond adequately to new challenges and, crucially, to improve working conditions in the sector. The article concludes that a social investment approach cannot resolve these problems and that there is a need for a new paradigm that acknowledges the inherent value of care work and prioritizes the long-term sustainability of care provision.

show abstract

Habiter en Ehpad au temps de la Covid-19

Abstract: Caisse nationale d'allocations familiales | « Revue des politiques sociales et familiales » 2021/4 n°141 | pages 31 à 48

Cited by 10 publications

References 11 publications

Coping Strategies of the Inhabitants of Collaborative and Regular Housing Arrangements during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Emerging Conceptual Re-elaboration of the Underlying Mechanisms through an Integrative Literature Review

Coping Strategies of the Inhabitants of Collaborative and Regular Housing Arrangements during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Emerging Conceptual Re-elaboration of the Underlying Mechanisms through an Integrative Literature Review

Penser en temps de pandémie : l’expérience du deuil en EHPAD, entre rupture et continuité

The limits of social investment and the resilience of long-term care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About