2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat suitability and protection status of four species of amphibians in the Dominican Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, Haiti's neighbor, the Dominican Republic, is not a major refuge for Haitian species because more than half of the species surveyed (51%, average) on mountains with primary forest are endemic to Haiti and 12% are endemic to an individual mountain in Haiti (SI Appendix). In addition, forest loss in the Dominican Republic is a threat to that country's biodiversity (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, Haiti's neighbor, the Dominican Republic, is not a major refuge for Haitian species because more than half of the species surveyed (51%, average) on mountains with primary forest are endemic to Haiti and 12% are endemic to an individual mountain in Haiti (SI Appendix). In addition, forest loss in the Dominican Republic is a threat to that country's biodiversity (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our SDMs indicate suitable environmental conditions are still present across large areas of the Dominican Republic, and local hunting of native mammals is thought to have ceased, solenodon and hutia populations might still be reduced or absent in areas of good‐quality habitat due to competition or predation by invasive mammals (Turvey et al, 2014). Furthermore, land cover and tree cover are included within final total survey models for both solenodons and hutias, with probability of presence increasing with tree cover, but forest loss in the Dominican Republic is estimated at >11% per year (higher than regional averages for the Neotropics) and is accelerating, even within many protected areas (Lloyd & León, 2019; Pasachnik, Carreras De León, & León, 2016; Sangermano et al, 2015), and with tourism infrastructural development impacting mangrove ecosystems required by hutias (Meyer‐Arendt, Byrd, & Hamilton, 2013). Our SDMs therefore predict the distribution of current conservation‐priority landscapes for both species, but these landscapes require further fieldwork to investigate continued presence of native mammals, especially for regions with predicted habitat suitability but lacking records (e.g., Sierra de Neiba), combined with targeted spatial management to maintain key habitat integrity into the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained land cover data for 2004 (representing the most recent publically available data) from the Dominican Republic Ministry of Environment (cf. Sangermano et al, 2015); we again combined similar habitat types into broader grouped categories for analysis, resulting in a final set of 45 categories. Additional bioclimatic variables (e.g., from http://www.worldclim.org) could not be included because these are only available at coarser spatial resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to extract the appropriate percent tree cover that would separate forest from non-forest in the Dominican Republic, we intersected the MODIS vegetation continuous fields (VCF) percent tree cover data with the land cover map and used the average percent tree cover within densely forested areas as the threshold. Although the average percent tree cover was 48%, the threshold was rounded up to 50% to produce a more conservative definition forest [7] .…”
Section: Data Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%