Habitat Scale Mapping of Fisheries Ecosystem Service Values in Estuaries

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Little is known about the variability of ecosystem service values at spatial scales most relevant to local decision makers. Competing definitions of ecosystem services, the paucity of ecological and economic information, and the lack of standardization in methodology are major obstacles to applying the ecosystem-services approach at the estuary scale. We present a standardized method that combines habitat maps and habitat-faunal associations to estimate ecosystem service values for recreational and commercial fisheries in estuaries. Three case studies in estuaries on the U.S. west coast (Yaquina Bay, Oregon), east coast (Lagoon Pond, Massachusetts), and the Gulf of Mexico (Weeks Bay, Alabama) are presented to illustrate our method's rigor and limitations using available data. The resulting spatially explicit maps of fisheries ecosystem service values show within and between estuary variations in the value of estuarine habitat types that can be used to make better informed resource-management decisions.

Ecosystem Services of Coastal Habitats and Fisheries: Multiscale Ecological and Economic Models in Support of Ecosystem‐Based Management

“…We also estimated the total exvessel value of shrimp and crab production from the Mobile Bay system and the values per hectare of SAV for each scenario. The blue crab model has been applied at a finer, subestuary scale (O'Higgins et al 2010).…”

Ecosystem Services and River Basin Ecohydrology

“…estimated that these wetlands had an overall value of 22,832$ ha −1 year −1 , although more recent studies conclude that this value may be much higher (Jørgensen 2010;Barbier et al 2011). Situations like the ones described may create massive pressures on natural resources (due to activities' expansion, development, nutrients inputs, among others), impacting around 90 % of previously important species and destroying roughly 65 % of seagrass and wetland habitats, while degrading water quality and accelerating species invasion in estuaries O'Higgins et al 2010). In Portugal, coastal areas account for only 8 % of the continental area, although 76 % of the population is concentrated in these areas (OECD 2011), with a density which is twice as high as the average for continental inhabitants'/km 2 ; Pinho 2007; OECD 2011).…”

A vulnerability framework to protect coastal social ecological systems

“…While there is considerable weight of theory to support more sustainable approaches to natural resource management, global assessments of practical progress to more sustainable development are depressingly consistent (e.g., IPBES 2019) and international policies for food production, which dominate the modern globe and generally fail to incorporate consideration of the multiple ecosystem services provided by nature, resulting in the gradual erosion of environmental quality (O'Higgins 2017; Rouillard et al 2018). Based on our experiences of working with adaptation to climate change (Gray et al 2013(Gray et al , 2016DCCAE 2018aDCCAE , 2018b and application of ecosystem service concepts (O'Higgins et al 2010;Jordan et al 2012;O'Higgins and Gilbert 2014), the motivation behind this paper is to illustrate the simplicity and broad applicability of ecosystem service and adaptive management concepts (each component of ecosystem-based management) and to provide an integrated practical framework for future application.…”