2002
DOI: 10.2307/3071782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat Preferences of Aporosa in Two Malaysian Forests: Implications for Abundance and Coexistence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change from aggregation to regular distribution, however, suggests that density-dependent mortality erased aggregation within the specific habitat. Nevertheless, the effects of habitat association on structuring spatial patterns were generally weak, in concordance with previous studies (Webb and Peart 2000;Harms et al 2001;Debski et al 2002). The weak effects were likely caused by the magnitude of habitat heterogeneity being too small to induce strong aggregations within a suitable habitat.…”
Section: Dipterocarpus Cornutussupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The change from aggregation to regular distribution, however, suggests that density-dependent mortality erased aggregation within the specific habitat. Nevertheless, the effects of habitat association on structuring spatial patterns were generally weak, in concordance with previous studies (Webb and Peart 2000;Harms et al 2001;Debski et al 2002). The weak effects were likely caused by the magnitude of habitat heterogeneity being too small to induce strong aggregations within a suitable habitat.…”
Section: Dipterocarpus Cornutussupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The phases assumed an increase in basal area and decrease in stem number over time after gap formation. The ratio in each 20 9 20-m subplot was divided into four quartile groups, from 1 (shortly after gap formation) to 4 (mature forest) (for details, see Debski et al 2002).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the tree species composition on upper slopes and ridges can differ considerably from the tree species composition in swamps, river valleys and on lower slopes (Basnet 1992;Newbery et al 1996;Niiyama et al 1999;Rennolls and Laumonier 2000;Cox et al 2002;Debski et al 2002;Gibbons and Newbery 2002). This could mean that the tree species diversity that is preserved in swamps, river valleys and lower slopes after fire only represents a part of the total tree species composition that was present in the forest before the fires.…”
Section: Topographic Patterns In Tree Species Diversitymentioning
confidence: 95%