2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths – The example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indications for this are found in habitat fragmentation studies that have been undertaken at a range of different spatial scales, revealing the relative importance of within-patch habitat compared to spatial measures such as patch size and isolation between habitat fragments (e.g. Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Ranius 2000;Binzenhofer et al 2005). For example, in a study on a burnet moth species in an abandoned agricultural landscape in Germany, Binzenhofer et al (2005) found that presence of the species was mainly explained by total nectar plant cover (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indications for this are found in habitat fragmentation studies that have been undertaken at a range of different spatial scales, revealing the relative importance of within-patch habitat compared to spatial measures such as patch size and isolation between habitat fragments (e.g. Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Ranius 2000;Binzenhofer et al 2005). For example, in a study on a burnet moth species in an abandoned agricultural landscape in Germany, Binzenhofer et al (2005) found that presence of the species was mainly explained by total nectar plant cover (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rukke and Midtgaard 1998;Ranius 2000;Binzenhofer et al 2005). For example, in a study on a burnet moth species in an abandoned agricultural landscape in Germany, Binzenhofer et al (2005) found that presence of the species was mainly explained by total nectar plant cover (i.e. habitat availability) within patches, whereas no patch size or isolation effect between habitat patches was found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We considered also the variable distance from rivers, because suitable corridors for red deer may be localized near rivers (Patthey 2003). As the explanatory variables were not normally distributed, we performed a correlation analysis based on Spearman's coefficient and we analysed the paired plots of explanatory variables to exclude highly correlated (rs<0.5; Binzenhöfer et al 2005) predictors from the subsequent modelling procedure.…”
Section: Habitat Suitability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each model included different subsets of explanatory variables. We also tested the models including the squared terms of the predictors to account for potential unimodal relationships with the dependent variables (Binzenhöfer et al 2005). …”
Section: Habitat Suitability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%