2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9030266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat Mapping and Quality Assessment of NATURA 2000 Heathland Using Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy

Abstract: Appropriate management of (semi-)natural areas requires detailed knowledge of the ecosystems present and their status. Remote sensing can provide a systematic, synoptic view at regular time intervals, and is therefore often suggested as a powerful tool to assist with the mapping and monitoring of protected habitats and vegetation. In this study, we present a multi-step mapping framework that enables detailed NATURA 2000 (N2000) heathland habitat patch mapping and the assessment of their conservation status at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of single sensor classifications (ALS15, HS15, ALS17, and HS17) confirm the high data relevance, generating high Kappa values ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 (Table 6). These results conform with findings of other researchers who successfully classified Natura 2000 habitats using only ALS [8,41,42] or only HS data [43,44] with similar accuracies. This allows us to claim that for the purposes of non-forest Natura 2000 habitats classification, for which the data sets are correctly matched in terms of spatial resolution (2 m 2 ) and point cloud density (8 pts./m 2 ), both sensors can be useful.…”
Section: Airborne Laser Scanning Vs Hyperspectral Imagessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of single sensor classifications (ALS15, HS15, ALS17, and HS17) confirm the high data relevance, generating high Kappa values ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 (Table 6). These results conform with findings of other researchers who successfully classified Natura 2000 habitats using only ALS [8,41,42] or only HS data [43,44] with similar accuracies. This allows us to claim that for the purposes of non-forest Natura 2000 habitats classification, for which the data sets are correctly matched in terms of spatial resolution (2 m 2 ) and point cloud density (8 pts./m 2 ), both sensors can be useful.…”
Section: Airborne Laser Scanning Vs Hyperspectral Imagessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or UA systems (UASs) in forest and environmental monitoring [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] is currently in an expansion phase, encouraged by the constant development of new models and sensors [3,16,17]. Detailed reviews focusing on the use of UAVs in agro-forestry monitoring, inventorying, and mapping are provided by Tang and Shao [16], Pádua et al [3], and Torresan et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists analysed C. epigejos and M. caerule spreading using statistical methods [44,45]. Several authors used hyperspectral images to identify particular species encroaching into heathlands: M. caerulea entering the Natura 2000 habitat classification was addressed by Mücher et al [46] in the areas of Ederheide and Ginkelse heide in the Netherlands and by Haest et al [47] in Kalmthouse Heide in Belgium. C. epigejos was mentioned by Schmidt et al [48] in Oranienbaum Heath located near Dessau in the Elbe-Mulde-lowland in Saxony-Anhalt in Germany, but only with encroaching into heathlands being the main object of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%