1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00354.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat duration, predation risk and phenotypic plasticity in common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles

Abstract: Summary1. Common frogs (Rana temporaria) breed readily in small pools and thus expose their ospring to catastrophic mortality by desiccation. Amphibian larvae exhibit considerable phenotypic plasticity in metamorphic traits, and some species respond to environmental uncertainty by metamorphosing earlier and at smaller size. In a factorial laboratory experiment, we studied whether common frog tadpoles possess this ability. 2. We also studied the interaction between pool drying and predation risk, because in a p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
160
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(72 reference statements)
6
160
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The bene®t of the ®rst factor for development has been con®rmed by several laboratory studies (Tejedo & Reques, 1992;Semlitsch, 1993;Newman, 1994). Also the second factor promotes feeding rate as it allows tadpoles to feed more openly (Laurila & Kujasalo, 1999) and therefore more ef®ciently. Indeed, several laboratory studies and experiments in ®eld enclosures have shown a negative effect of predators on development rate (Skelly & Werner, 1990;Skelly, 1992).…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature and Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bene®t of the ®rst factor for development has been con®rmed by several laboratory studies (Tejedo & Reques, 1992;Semlitsch, 1993;Newman, 1994). Also the second factor promotes feeding rate as it allows tadpoles to feed more openly (Laurila & Kujasalo, 1999) and therefore more ef®ciently. Indeed, several laboratory studies and experiments in ®eld enclosures have shown a negative effect of predators on development rate (Skelly & Werner, 1990;Skelly, 1992).…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature and Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A possible scenario follows. For some frog species it has been shown or suggested that tadpoles reduce activity in the presence of predators (Skelly & Werner, 1990;Semlitsch & Reyer, 1992;Anholt & Werner, 1999), thus reducing growth rate (Skelly, 1992;Laurila & Kujasalo, 1999). It is possible that low activity level is a ®xed trait for tadpoles from some ponds (and thus persisted when raised in tanks).…”
Section: Pond Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It makes sense that tadpoles in temporary ponds develop quickly, but why also grow larger? The fate of the pond is conditional and the response (a faster 97 Tadpole growth: microevolution and egg size effects development) is at least partly facultative (Laurila & Kujasalo, 1999;Loman, 1999;. Also, some studies suggest that increased development rate has a price, namely decreased growth rate (Laurila & Kujasalo 1999;.…”
Section: Pond Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phenotypic plasticity that has been designed by natural selection is one form of organic adaptation. Conspicuous plastic morphological changes induced by biological agents are known to be inducible morphological defences, triggered by remote chemical cues of the inducing agents in several prey species (Stemberger & Gilbert 1984;Lively 1986;Dodson 1989;Kusch 1993;Bronmark & Pettersson 1994;Tollrian 1995;Trussell 1996;McCollum & Leimberger 1997;Dahl & Peckarsky 2002;Laurila & Kujasalo 1999;Van Buskirk & Arioli 2002;Kishida & Nishimura 2004). Inducible predator morphs (carnivorous morphs) have also been reported in some organisms such as rotifers, anuran tadpoles and larval salamanders (Gilbert 1973;Pfennig 1990;Hoffman & Pfennig 1999;Michimae & Wakahara 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%