Primate Ecology and Conservation 2013
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659449.003.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat assessment and species niche modeling

Abstract: This chapter presents an overview of classic habitat assessment techniques, how such studies can be carried out on various budgets, and with a range of equipment from traditional to modern. It also addresses the important issue of how to decide where to look for these elusive species, and whether it is always worth going to the field at all through a discussion of the merits of species niche modelling (SNM) — computer-based models that predict potential species distributions, futures, and fates from existing d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 813 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each camera trap location we recorded the latitude and longitude (with a global positioning system), altitude and habitat variables. These included the major habitat type (rice cultivation: n = 18; garden cultivation: n = 7; shrubland and degraded forest: n = 7; teak plantation: n = 10; tall forest: n = 76; community forest: n = 8; for definitions see Rademaker et al, 2016), mean tree diameter at breast height, mean tree height in a 10 × 10 m plot around the camera-trap location, and tree density using the T-square method (Rode et al, 2013) with two sample points (for details see Rademaker et al, 2016). We calculated the mean litter depth in four 1 × 1 m subplots in the corners of the plot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each camera trap location we recorded the latitude and longitude (with a global positioning system), altitude and habitat variables. These included the major habitat type (rice cultivation: n = 18; garden cultivation: n = 7; shrubland and degraded forest: n = 7; teak plantation: n = 10; tall forest: n = 76; community forest: n = 8; for definitions see Rademaker et al, 2016), mean tree diameter at breast height, mean tree height in a 10 × 10 m plot around the camera-trap location, and tree density using the T-square method (Rode et al, 2013) with two sample points (for details see Rademaker et al, 2016). We calculated the mean litter depth in four 1 × 1 m subplots in the corners of the plot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%